The “Miracle Hope”  SGHCR 3
Ship arrest: rights of intervener and applicant’s duty of disclosure
The plaintiff, the Singapore branch of the bank Natixis, had arrested the vessel
Miracle Hope for breach of the contract of carriage evidenced by bills of lading. The second intervener, Petrobras, applied to set aside
the warrant of arrest on the basis that Natixis had failed to bring certain material facts to the court’s attention at the
time it applied for the warrant of arrest.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.