This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
From time to time, a disappointed beneficiary may challenge the validity of a Will, by alleging that the testator lacks capacity
to make a Will, that the testator did not know or approve the contents of the disputed Will, or even perhaps that the Will
was forged. Such litigation can provide colourful copy for journalists, not least because of the venom with which family disputes
may be pursued. Not surprisingly, the courts have adopted rules to limit those who have the standing to bring proceedings
to challenge the validity of a Will. A challenge to the validity of a Will may only be brought by a party who has an “interest
in the estate” which must be specified in the claim form. A beneficiary, or potential beneficiary (for example, under an intestacy
if the Will is held to be invalid) clearly has such an interest. Nineteenth century case law suggested that, for these purposes,
a creditor had no “interest in the estate” to allow a challenge to the Will. However, what about the creditor of a beneficiary?
Here, the old case law was unclear. It has now been considered by the Court of Appeal in
Randall v Randall (2016) EWCA Civ 494.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.