We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

The interview process

Intellectual Property Magazine

The interview process

Drew Schulte explains how to overcome subject matter eligibility rejections in the US using examiner interviews

As we near the seventh anniversary of the Supreme Court of the US’ decision in Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, 1 we can compare the state of subject matter eligibility to the state of obviousness following KSR Int’l Co v Teleflex Inc, 2 which occurred seven years prior to Alice. Both decisions seemingly introduced additional subjectivity into their respective subject matters despite having the intention to provide more objectivity. Alice introduced the two-part test, which quickly gained complexity through additional sub-parts (ie, ‘step 2A’ and ‘step 2B’), and sub-parts to the sub-parts (ie, ‘step 2A Prong 1’ and ‘step 2A Prong 2’).

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more