We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Humans and machines

Intellectual Property Magazine

Humans and machines

In contradiction to findings in Australia andSouth Africa, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia hasruled 1 that an AI machinecannot be named as an inventor under the US Patent Act.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more