We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

BELL AND ANOTHER v THE TAVISTOCK AND PORTMAN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST, AND NHS ENGLAND (INTERESTED PARTY), AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST, LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST, TRANSGENDER TREND LTD, BROOK, GENDERED INTELLIGENCE, THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, DR DAVID BELL, THE ASSOCIATION OF LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN AND LIBERTY (INTERVENERS)

Medical Law Reports Plus

BELL AND ANOTHER v THE TAVISTOCK AND PORTMAN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST, AND NHS ENGLAND (INTERESTED PARTY), AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST, LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST, TRANSGENDER TREND LTD, BROOK, GENDERED INTELLIGENCE, THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, DR DAVID BELL, THE ASSOCIATION OF LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN AND LIBERTY (INTERVENERS)

[2021] Med LR Plus 32

COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

Before Lord Burnett of Maldon, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, and Lady Justice King

Children - Declarations - Medical treatment - Puberty blocking drugs - Gender dysphoria - Gillick competence - Informed consent - Court jurisdiction

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more