i-law.com

ROGERSON v. SCOTTISH AUTOMOBILE & GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 1

Insurance (motor car) - Third party risks - Declaration claimed by assured that he was entitled to be indemnified by the insurers - "This insurance shall cover the legal liability as aforesaid of the assured in respect of the use by the assured of any motor car (other than a hired car), provided that such car is at the time of the accident being used instead of 'the insured car'" - Insurance of Lancia torpedo-bodied car - Exchange for Lancia saloon car of approximately same value and power - Whether saloon car being used "instead of" insured car-

IN RE INSURANCE ACT OF CANADA. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF QUEBEC v. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF CANADA; AND CROSS-APPEAL. (BELDING-CORTICELLI, LTD., AN OTHERS, INTERVENING.)

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 4

Canada - Insurance - Legislative competence of Dominion - Conflict between Dominion and Province - British North America Act, 1867, Sects. 91, 92 - Insurance Act, 1927, Sects. 11, 12, 65, 66 - Special War Revenue Act, 1927, Sects, 16, 20, 21 - Whether unconstitutional and ultra vires - In answer to questions put by the Lieutenant-Governor in Council, held (1) that a foreign or British insurer who holds a licence under the Quebec Insurance Act to carry on business within the Province is not obliged to observe and is not subject to Sects. 11, 12, 65 and 66 of the Insurance Act and that these sections are unconstitutional and ultra vires as regards such insurer; (2) that Sects. 16, 20 and 21 of the Special War Revenue Act are not within the legislative competence of the Parliament of Canada and that there is no difference between the case of an insurer who has obtained or is bound to obtain under the provincial law a licence to carry on business in the Province and any other case.

THE "ALDINGTON COURT."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 11

Charter-party - Discharging expenses - Bag or bulk cargo - Cargo shipped in bags, bags started in holds and cargo discharged by elevator - Receivers acting as own stevedores-Deduction from freight of stevedoring charger on bag basis - Schedule of rates (Avonmouth) - Construction -

KING v. TRAVELLERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 13

Insurance - Baggage policy - Loss of fur coat on journey from London to Nice - "The whole of the baggage must be insured, and not merely a portion of same either in respect of value or package . . . Jewellery, watches, field glasses, cameras and other fragile or specially valuable articles must be separately declared and valued . . . Claims for partial loss of contents of any package will be met in proportion to the total sum insured" - Trunk, containing fur coat of an alleged value of £240, insured for £300 - Whether trunk excessively under-insured - "Fragile or specially valuable articles" - Ejusdem generis rule -

MARITIME INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. FORTUNE & SON.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 16

Negligence - Accountants - Plaintiff insurance company with branch at West Hartlepool - Defendants employed in connection with branch books - Fraud of plaintiffs' employee extending over a period of years - Whether defendants negligent in the performance of their duties - Dispute as to scope of defendants' employment-

SUBMARINE SIGNAL COMPANY & SUBMARINE SIGNAL CORPORATION v. HUGHES & SON, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 21

Patent - Infringement - Echo sounding apparatus for use in ships - "Fessenden" patent - Claim for injunction and damages - Defence of invalidity and non-infringement-Electric oscillator -

ITALIAN IMPORTING COMPANY OF NEW YORK AND OTHERS v. NAVIGAZIONE LIBERA TRIESTINA SOC. ANON. (THE "CARSO.")

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 33

Bill of lading - Damage to cargo (cheese) - Claims by buyer-consignees against shipowners - Bill of lading reciting that cheese was "shipped in apparent good order and condition" - Drafts accepted by buyer-consignees, relying on clean bills of lading - Evidence that 162 cases were in good condition on shipment; that 420 cases were broken; and that 468 cases were stained by contents - Estoppel - "Notice of claim" clause -

GIOVANNI VINCENZO DEMARCO, DECEASED, NOW REPRESENTED BY MARIA CARMELA DEMARCO, AND OTHERS v. GIUSEPPE BIANCO.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 39

Contract-Purchase of ship-Agreement by defendant to advance £2000 towards plaintiff's partnership share of £4000 in yacht - Purchase of yacht cancelled in favour of steamship Ituna - Necessity for further capital - Whether defendant was a co-adventurer to the extent of one-half of plaintiff's ultimate contribution -

WARD v. BRITISH OAK INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 42

Insurance (motor) - Third party liability - Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act, 1930, Sect. 1 (1) - Judgment for plaintiff against insured company - Voluntary liquidation of company before writ issued and judgment given - Whether rights of insured company against insurers vested in plaintiff - Retrospection -

THE "PICARD."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 45

Collision - Damages - Detention for repairs - Reference - Objection to Registrar's report - Evidence of pre-collision damage - Whether account taken of owners' repairs as distinct from collision repairs; of riveting necessitated by pre-collision damage -

CREDIT FONCIER D'ALGERIE ET DE TUNISIE v. SIMPSON, SPENCE & YOUNG.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 48

Assignment - Charter-party - Freight - Charter fixed by defendants as chartering agents-Advance by plaintiff bank to shipowners on security of freight - Instructions given by defendants through their New York house to their agents (X & Co.) to collect freight on plaintiffs' behalf - X & Co. acting also as ship's agents - Contradictory instructions given to X & Co. by N on behalf of shipowners - Defendants warned of instructions - Warning ignored - Freight not collected on plaintiffs' behalf - Liability of defendants to plaintiffs -

GUILFOYLE v. PORT OF LONDON AUTHORITY.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 50

Nuisance - Liability of public authority (Port of London Authority) - Duty to repair and maintain swing bridge (Connaught Road Bridge) connecting two public highways - Nonfeasance - Accident to plaintiff through disrepair of bridge - Damages awarded by jury - "The swing bridge shall be kept [available for public use] except when required to be opened for dock traffic"- Port of London (Consolidation) Act, 1920, Sects. 378, 380 -

ELLERBECK COLLIERIES, LTD. v. CORNHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 57

Workmen's compensation insurance - Industrial disease - Miner's nystagmus - Appeal by insurance company from a judgment in favour of respondent employers-Provisional cover for period Mar. 8 to Mar. 19, 1929 - Certificates of surgeon dated Mar. 11 and 12 that workmen were suffering from nystagmus and that the disablement commenced on those days - Finding of medical referee, on appeal, agreeing with certifying surgeon, with an additional finding that workmen suffered from nystagmus before Jan. 1, 1929 - Jurisdiction of referee-Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925, Sect. 43 - "Disablement [by an industrial disease] shall be treated as the happening of the accident . . . The date of disablement shall be such date as the certifying surgeon certifies as the date on which the disablement commenced, or, if he is unable to certify such a date, the date on which the certificate is given . . ." - Workmen, although on respondents' books, in fact not earning wages during period of cover - Contention that workmen were not in respondents' service at material time -

THE "MYNONIE R. KIRBY."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 65

Salvage - Services rendered to auxiliary schooner Mynonie R. Kirby at anchor off Brixhom by tug Dencade - Motor engine out of action - Windlass disabled - Anchors slipped and vessel towed 11 miles to Brixham harbour - Salved values: £400 -

MORGAN AND FOXON v. PROVINCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 68

Insurance (motor) - Accident to lorry - Claim - Statement in proposal form that lorry would be used for purpose of delivering coal - Evidence that lorry had unloaded timber prior to accident (at which time lorry was delivering coal) - Whether statement in proposal form constituted a warranty -

WEDDELL AND ANOTHER v. ROAD TRANSPORT & GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 69

Insurance (motor) - Third party risks - First claimant's car driven by second claimant - X injured - Action brought by X against second claimant - Claim against respondents for indemnity - Two policies - First claimant insured with respondents; second claimant with C company - Claim under C company's policy out of time - Respondents' policy with, C company's policy without, rateable proportion clause - Each policy containing extended cover provided indemnity not afforded by another policy - Arbitration - Award that R company were liable to pay only a rateable proportion (one-half) of damages awarded -

DAWSON LINE, LTD. v. AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT "ADLER" FUER CHEMISCHE INDUSTRIE.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 75

Charter-party - Freight - (11). "Bills of lading to be signed by the master . . . at the offices of charterers' agents" - (14). Freight to be paid "on bill of lading weight less 2 per cent. in lieu of weighing but receivers to have the option . . . to pay on delivered weight in which event cargo to be weighed on board or alongside by official weighers . . ." - Loading of coal tar pitch - Indication from vessel's draught that coal tar pitch was shipped in excess of bill of lading weight - Weighing of cargo at ship's request - Outturn weight 132 tons in excess of bill of lading weight-Freight paid by charterers (receivers) on outturn weight less 2 per cent. - Right of charterers to deduct 2 per cent.-Basis of deduction -

THE "MEDIA."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 80

Practice - Writ - Application to set aside - Dispute under bill of lading-Claim by cargo-owners against shipowners in respect of damage to cargo - "All claims arising under this bill of lading shall be determined at the port of destination. [Calcutta] of the goods according to British law, or, at the shipowners' option, they shall be determined in the United Kingdom, and to the exclusion of the jurisdiction of any other country" - Shipowners' option not exercised - Writ issued in England - Action time-barred in India-

THE "PACIFIC."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 83

Salvage - Services rendered by salvage tugs Seemowe, Hermes and Capella to damaged steamer Pacific off Kiel - Pacific badly holed after collision with steamer Emsstrom - Heavy list - Probability that Pacific would soon have sunk - Pumping and plugging services - Towage - Account to be taken of fact that plaintiffs are a salvage company, with well-equipped vessels and competent staff - Salved values: £22,000 - Services also rendered by Emsstrom -

KAUKUL v. ANGLO-SOVIET SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 90

Master and servant - Wrongful dismissal - Claim for damages - Allegation by plaintiff that he was dismissed because he refused to go to Russia - Whether summary dismissal justified - Duty of plaintiff under his contract of employment - Defendants' contention that plaintiff left of his own accord - Findings of jury: that plaintiff was dismissed by defendants; that he did not refuse to go to Russia on defendants' business; that he did refuse to go to Russia to satisfy a non-commercial purpose [i.e., outside his contract of employment]; and that he was entitled to damages for wrongful dismissal (twelve months' salary in lieu of notice).

SEAHAM HARBOUR DOCK COMPANY v. CROOK (INSPECTOR OF TAXES).

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 95

Revenue - Income Tax - Grant to dock company from Unemployment Grants Committee for dock extension work - Grant for a period of two years of a sum equivalent to half of the interest on approved expenditure met out of certain loans - Nature of grant - Whether a capital or an income receipt-

McCULLUM v. NORTHUMBRIAN STEAM SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 97

Workmen's compensation - Accident arising out of and in the course of the workman's employment - Claim by dependant of deceased boatswain-Fall into dock - Boatswain making his way from his home to his ship to take up duties (super-added to his articles of agreement as boatswain) as night watchman - Custom that seamen in their home port are allowed to reside at home - Whether deceased should be treated as in continuous employment as a seaman - Finding of learned County Court Judge that deceased must be treated as an ordinary workman going to his work; that his employment began immediately he entered the dock premises; and that the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment -

THE "GUSTY."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 104

Collision between motor tug Midge (towing two spirit laden barges) and barge (in tow of tug Gusty) in Bow Creek in broad daylight - Midge bound up; Gusty, headed down, manoeuvring across river to bring her barges to a berth - Midge sunk - Whether Midge had adequate warning of Gusty's intended manoeuvre - Look-out-Whether Midge had sufficient power - Dangerous tow -

DOME MINING CORPORATION, LTD. v. DRYSDALE.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 109

Insurance - Accident to plaintiffs' land gold dredge - Dredge overturned during storm - Claim for total loss - Subsequent alternative claim for partial loss - Payment into Court by underwriters on basis of partial loss - Defence; that claim was false and fraudulent, in that plaintiffs' claim on a total loss basis was made knowing that the dredge was not a total loss, or recklessly, not caring whether the dredge was or was not a total loss - "If the assured shall make any claim knowing the same to be false or fraudulent, as regards amount or otherwise, this policy shall become void, and all claim thereunder shall be forfeited" -Incorrect report of condition of dredge signed by plaintiffs' engineer after pressure improperly put upon him by plaintiffs' agent at plaintiffs' request-

THE "HOCHELAGA."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 133

Collision between steamships Leopold L.D. and Hochelaga in River St. Lawrence - Leopold L.D. proceeding down river in mid-channel; Hochelaga proceeding up river on the port side - Collision Regulations, Art. 25 - Narrow channel rule - Duty to pass port to port - Endeavour by Hochelaga at last moment to conform to rule - Whether Leopold L.D. should have notified by signal her intention to ignore rule -

SLINGSBY AND OTHERS v. DISTRICT BANK, LTD. (MANCHESTER).

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 138

Negotiable instruments - Cheque - Indorsement -Cumberbirch, partner in Cumberbirch & Potts, solicitors for executors of T, prepares cheque payable to X & Co. in his own writing for signature by executors and leaves space after words X & Co.-Cheque drawn on defendant bank-"Pay X & Co. . . . or order"-Fraudulent alteration of cheque by Cumberbirch to: "Pay X & Co. per Cumberbirch & Potts or order"-Cheque indorsed "Cumberbirch & Potts" and paid by Cumberbirch into Westminster Bank to the account of company of which he was chairman-Cheque cleared and plaintiffs' account at defendant bank debited - Claim by plaintiffs against defendant bank - Duty of customer towards bank-Bills of Exchange Act, 1882, Sects. 60, 64, 79, 80, 82-

REDERIAKTIEBOLAGET URANIA v. ZACHARIADES.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 145

Charter-party - Dead freight - Charter by defendant of plaintiffs' steamer of "about 80,000 grain cubic ft." to carry full and complete cargo of locust beans - "Should captain find that he can take more cargo than above, charterers shall have the option of giving same or not . . ." - Defendant's cargo loaded, vessel arriving with vacant space of 15,000 cubic ft. - Shipowners' contention that charterer did not load a full and complete cargo; charterer's contention that, bearing in mind the weight of beans loaded, the vessel must have had a larger capacity than 80,000 cubic ft. -

LONDON & NORTHERN TRADING COMPANY, LTD. v. ARCOS, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 150

Contract - Breach - Claim under agreement in settlement of disputes arising out of contracts for the sale of sleepers by defendants to plaintiffs - Plaintiffs to receive from defendants an allowance of £85,000 - "On account of the above-mentioned £85,000, [defendants] hand over to [plaintiffs] in London . . . acceptances . . . for the sum of £70,000 payable in London . . . The remaining £15,000 are to be deducted at one shilling per sleeper at the payment of the last 300,000 . . ."-Plaintiffs to give defendants deposit acceptances for £75,000 as security for payment for the goods-Acceptances to be exchanged by Aug. 7 - Failure of defendants to hand over acceptances on due date - Measure of damages - Market price less than contract price - Meaning of "allowance"-

DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET BOTNIA A/S. v. BELL & CO.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 160

Charter-party-Dead freight-"Scanfin" charter - Vessel chartered to load timber at Mollersvik (Finland) - "Cargo shall be loaded at the rate of 125 fathoms per weather working day on an average during the ordinary working hours of the port . . . Sundays, and general or local holidays excepted (unless used)"-Loading of full cargo prevented by ice - Meaning of "weather working day"-

FOSCOLO, MANGO & CO., LTD., AND H. C. VIVIAN & CO., LTD. v. STAG LINE, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 165

Bill of lading - Deviation - Loss of ship and cargo by perils of the sea-Vessel bound from Swansea to Istanbul with coal - Course altered for St. Ives to land engineers (on board to superintend working of super-heater)-Vessel wrecked soon after leaving St. Ives - "With liberty to sail without pilots, to call at any ports in any order, for bunkering or other purposes or to make trial trips after notice or adjust compasses all as part of the contract voyage . . ."-Construction-Ejusdem generis rule - Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1924, Schedule, Art. IV (2) (a), (c), (4) - (4): "Any reasonable deviation shall not be deemed to be an infringement or breach of these rules or of the contract of carriage . . ." - Meaning of "reasonable deviation"

THE "TORNI."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 174

Bill of lading - Conflict of laws - Damage to and short delivery of cargo (oranges) - Unseaworthiness - Bills of lading issued and signed by residents in Palestine, cargo being shipped by regular service from Palestine to England - Claims by plaintiff cargo-owners against shipowners: (1) as indorsees suing under Bills of Lading Act, 1855; (2) upon implied contract arising from presentation of, taking of delivery and payment of freight under, bills of lading - "This bill of lading wherever signed, is to be construed in accordance with English law" - Whether contract governed by English law or by implied clause paramount (Government of Palestine Carriage of Goods by Sea Ordinance, No. 43 of 1926) providing that "every bill of lading . . . issued in Palestine which contains or is evidence of any contract to which the rules [in effect the Hague Rules] apply shall contain an express statement that it is to have effect subject to the provisions of the said rules as applied by this Ordinance, and shall be deemed to have effect subject thereto, notwithstanding the omission of such express statement" - Intention of parties - Illegality-

HVALFANGERSELSKAPET POLARIS A/S. v. UNILEVER, LTD., LEVER BROS., LTD., AND ANOTHER. HVALFANGERSELSKAPET GLOBUS A/S. v. SAME.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 182

Contract - Sale of goods - Breach - Agreement by plaintiffs to sell to defendants entire production of whale oil per plaintiffs' whale oil factory ships, defendants to take delivery of oil directly on arrival of ships in Europe - Tender of oil to defendants after transhipment into plaintiffs' tankers - Rejection by defendants - Claim by plaintiffs for damages or rectification - Construction - Inference to be drawn from previous transactions between parties -

JORDESON & CO. v. STORA KOPPARBERGS BERGSLAGS AKTIEBOLAG.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 201

Arbitration-Submission-Sale of timber- Sub-sale by buyers to R. & Co.-Timber forwarded to R. & Co.-Notice of rejection subsequently given to sellers by buyers and by R. & Co.-Arbitration- Whether quality of timber was such as to give buyers a right of rejection or whether it should be accepted with an allowance - Award in form of special case - Finding of umpire that buyers were entitled to reject the timber shipped; that the buyers did not exercise their right of rejection but accepted the timber by forwarding it to their sub-buyers R. & Co. - Motion by buyers to set aside award - Jurisdiction of umpire -

THE "LAKEWOOD."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 207

Collision between steamships Deerhound and Lakewood in River Humber - Claim by owners of cargo on board Deerhound against Lakewood - Deerhound proceeding down; Lakewood overtaking - Grounding of Deerhound in consequence of failure to answer her helm - Deerhound run into by Lakewood - Capsizing of Deerhound as tide made - Damage to cargo - Liability of Lakewood - Finding of learned Judge that although the Lakewood was probably to blame for the collision, the damage suffered was not in consequence of the Lakewood's negligence - Appeal by cargo-owners - Onus of proof -

WESTRALIAN FARMERS, LTD. v. KING LINE, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 210

Charter-party - Commission on freight - Rate of exchange - Freight payable in British sterling or its equivalent - "(34) Five per cent. commission upon the freight . . . is due and payable at the loading port [Fremantle, W.A.] by the shipowners to the charterers on the vessel being loaded . . . (35) All sums due in Australia to the charterers shall be paid in Australian currency" - Construction - Charterers' contention that they were entitled in respect of commission on freight to a sum in Australian currency equivalent, at the rate of exchange between Great Britain and Australia on the date when such commission became due, to 5 per cent. of the sum in British sterling agreed to be paid in respect of freight - Whether British and Australian currencies identical-

UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD v. LAMBERT BROS., LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 216

Principal and agent - Account - Defendants acting as agents for steamships belonging to G company - Sum paid by G company to defendants for disbursements in connection with steamship A - Claim by plaintiffs (as G company's principals) for balance - Claim admitted by defendants, subject to counterclaim to set off amounts paid by them in respect of steamships B and C also owned by the G company - Relationship between parties - Whether defendants knew, when amounts paid in respect of steamships B and C, that G company were plaintiffs' agents - Constructive notice - Estoppel -

KAYE STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, LTD. v. BARNETT, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 231

Charter-party - Breach - Cancellation - Agreement by defendant charterers to load plaintiffs' steamship Kayeson at Rosario for United Kingdom-Notice of readiness given by master - Refusal of charterers to load-Charterers' plea that charter was entered into on condition that, there being a probability of boycotting, Messrs. D would not act as agents for the Kayeson in the Plate; that such condition was broken by shipowners; further, that charterers were not aware when charter was concluded that Messrs. D were plaintiffs' general agents in the Plate -

SUBMARINE SIGNAL COMPANY AND SUBMARINE SIGNAL CORPORATION v. HENRY HUGHES & SON, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 241

Patent - Infringement - Echo sounding apparatus for use in ships-"Fessenden" patent-Claim for injunction and damages-Defence of invalidity and non-infringement - Meaning of "electric oscillator" - Doctrine of mechanical equivalents-Finding of learned Judge that defendants' sound emitter was simply a mechanical equivalent for the electric oscillator in plaintiffs' apparatus, which constituted an infringement -

THE "RYDAL FORCE."

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 252

Collision between steam trawler Raindrop and steamship Rydal Force in North Sea during dense fog-Raindrop proceeding from Aberdeen to North Sea fishing grounds; Rydal Force bound southwards to Tyne-

LAZARD BROTHERS & CO., LTD. v. BROOKS.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 256

Insurance-"In and Out" policy-Agreement by plaintiff bankers to provide A with credit facilities in respect of shipment of hides, plaintiffs to accept drafts drawn by sellers, drafts to be accompanied by invoices and by letters from buyers acknowledging their indebtedness and undertaking to reimburse plaintiffs-Fraud of A and his associates in the transaction-Insolvency of A and his associates-Loss sustained by plaintiffs-Claim under policy covering securities (which by the recital included bills of exchange) "lost mislaid or accidentally destroyed and whether from within or without and whether by officers, clerks, or servants (whether authorised or unauthorised or on salary, commission, share in profits or apprenticed or otherwise) of the [plaintiffs] or by any other person or persons or by the negligence or fraudulent conduct of the said officers, clerks or servants or other person or persons" and "any other loss whatsoever through the theft, fraud, larceny, embezzlement or other dishonesty of or forgery by any such officer, clerk, servant, person or persons"-Meaning of "any other loss whatsoever"-"Other person or persons" - Ejusdem generis rule - Proximate cause of loss-

SVENSSONS TRAVARUAKTIEBOLAG v. CLIFFE STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 262

Charter-party-Short delivery-Loss of part of deck-load-Heeling over of vessel before cargo secured by lashing -Collapse of bulwarks-Whether deck-load excessive-Alleged negligence of captain in conduct of loading - Unseaworthiness - Doctrine of seaworthiness by stages-Deck-load "at charterers' risk" - Exception of "accidents of navigation . . . accidents to hull . . . even when occasioned by the negligence . . . of the . . . master"-

IN RE CITY OF LONDON INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

(1931) 41 Ll L Rep 270

Companies-Winding-up - Calls - Liability of "B" contributories-Calls made based on estimate-Excess over "B" contributories' liability - Duty of liquidator-

Lloyd's Law Reports