- Home/Publications/Lloyd's Shipping & Trade Law
Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd (‘The Bunga Melati Dua’) [2011] EWCA Civ 24
Marine Insurance - Piracy - Payment of ransom - Vessel and cargo released from seizure - whether cargo became an actual total loss on seizure - theft - public policy
Online Published Date:
03 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 02 - 03 March 2010
Melinda Holdings SA v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd ("The Silva") [2011] EWHC 181 (Comm)
P&I insurance – Whether ‘ordinary judicial process’ – Whether breach of duty to sue and labour
Online Published Date:
03 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 02 - 03 March 2010
Inherent vice and perils of the seas: Supreme Court finalises their scope
In Global Process Systems Inc v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Bhd (‘The Cendor Mopu’) [2011] UKSC 5, the Supreme Court dealt with the interpretation of the ‘inherent vice’ exclusion and in so doing widened the scope of the concept of ‘perils of the sea’. The court held that the exclusion would not apply where the result of weather and sea conditions - albeit they are foreseeable and ordinary - was fortuitous.
Online Published Date:
03 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 02 - 03 March 2010
Argo Systems FZE v Liberty Insurance and Anor [2011] EWHC 301 (Comm)
Breach of warranty – Waiver by estoppel – Affirmation of contract – Misrepresentation – Damages
Online Published Date:
30 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 03 - 29 March 2010
Sale of goods
Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA Case C-87/10
Online Published Date:
30 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 03 - 29 March 2010
X v Y [2011] EWHC 152(Comm)
Consecutive voyage charterparty - Time bar for claim in respect of first voyage
Online Published Date:
30 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 03 - 29 March 2010
Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd and Jiangsu Skyrun International Group Co Ltd v Orchard Tankers PTE Ltd [2011] EWHC 164 (Comm)
Shipbuilding Contract – Dispute resolution – Shipbuilder’s failure to institute arbitration proceedings timeously – Time bar
Online Published Date:
30 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 03 - 29 March 2010
The need for speed: Court of Appeal interprets UCP 600
Under art 16(c) of UCP 600, issuing or confirming banks must serve notice in case of non-compliance between the documents tendered by the seller and the letter of credit. The notice needs to specify any discrepancies and the documents should be returned to the seller, although art 16 is silent in relation to timing. Confirming the first instance judgment, the Court of Appeal in Fortis Bank SA/NV v Indian Overseas Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 58 re-emphasised the importance of a prompt return of documents to sender.
Online Published Date:
30 March 2011
Appeared in issue:
Vol 11 No 03 - 29 March 2010