International Construction Law Review
SOCLA NATIONAL CONFERENCE 2022: “GETTING RISK RIGHT” IMPROVING RISK ALLOCATION FOR GROUND CONDITIONS IN MAJOR SUBSURFACE PROJECTS
Andrew Stephenson
Partner, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Nastasja Suhadolnik
Partner, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
INTRODUCTION: PROBLEMS IN CURRENT APPROACHES TO RISK ALLOCATION FOR GROUND CONDITIONS
This paper explores the perennial problem associated with the risk of unexpected ground conditions encountered during the construction of major projects (particularly civil projects); challenges involved in understanding and pricing the risks associated with ground conditions; how contractual risk allocation for unexpected ground conditions can be improved; and the legal principles governing the allocation of such risk.
It is trite to observe that subsurface conditions are notoriously difficult to evaluate and predict. Practical limitations on geological and geotechnical investigations mean that actual subsurface conditions will not be fully known until after the construction is underway and in some cases only when the project is completed.
Take as an example traditional geotechnical investigations for tunnelling works. There is little information about actual conditions across a project site that can be gleaned from a finite set of bore logs, cores and test pits typically funded by the principal before a contract is tendered and awarded. Because of the relatively significant distance between locations of bores and where cores have been collected and the random distribution of rocks and other subsurface conditions, the data is limited. The only accurate information is at the location where a bore log is available (assuming that the log accurately records what was found or the cores that can be inspected).
302