i-law

Litigation Letter

Summary Disposal

James v Evans (TLR 2 August CA)

The trial judge had been correct in entering judgment for the claimant on the first day of a three-day hearing on the ground that the defendant had no real prospect of defending the claim. He had acted entirely appropriately and in line with the philosophy which underpinned the Civil Procedure Rules. A judge, in dealing justly with the claim, had the obligation to keep the trial in proportion and to allot to it an appropriate share of the resources of the court. Active management and rigorous identification of the issues at the directions stage and before witnesses were called to attend court would have avoided the case proceeding.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.