i-law

Litigation Letter

Incompetent advocate

Parmar and others (t/a Ace Knitwear) v Woods (Inspector of Taxes) (Ch D TLR 5 June)

On a tax appeal before a special commissioner the taxpayers were represented by a chartered accountant exercising his rights of audience. The chartered accountant called no evidence on the many issues of fact, being under the misapprehension that his submissions constituted evidence and that he was in effect both advocate and witness. The taxpayers also complained that the chartered accountant had advanced the wrong case and that an alternative case would have succeeded. Their application for a new trial on the grounds that they had not had a fair trial was dismissed. Notwithstanding any misunderstanding on the part of the chartered accountant there had been a fair trial. Objectively viewed, not only had justice been done but it had been seen to have been done. Nevertheless, the chartered accountant’s incompetence was seriously troubling and it was most unfortunate that his professional body allowed him to act as an advocate.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.