Litigation Letter
Incompetent advocate
Parmar and others (t/a Ace Knitwear) v Woods (Inspector of Taxes) (Ch D TLR 5 June)
On a tax appeal before a special commissioner the taxpayers were represented by a chartered accountant exercising his rights
of audience. The chartered accountant called no evidence on the many issues of fact, being under the misapprehension that
his submissions constituted evidence and that he was in effect both advocate and witness. The taxpayers also complained that
the chartered accountant had advanced the wrong case and that an alternative case would have succeeded. Their application
for a new trial on the grounds that they had not had a fair trial was dismissed. Notwithstanding any misunderstanding on the
part of the chartered accountant there had been a fair trial. Objectively viewed, not only had justice been done but it had
been seen to have been done. Nevertheless, the chartered accountant’s incompetence was seriously troubling and it was most
unfortunate that his professional body allowed him to act as an advocate.