i-law

Insurance Law Monthly

Forum non conveniens and applicable law

In Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd v Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange [2010] EWHC 2279 (Comm) Christopher Clarke J discussed a jurisdictional conflict arising out of a reinsurance contract, between the English courts and the courts of Ontario. The court has upheld the now accepted approach that issues of law arising under a contract governed by English law (under English conflict of laws rules) should be determined in England.

Stonebridge: the facts

The defendant reinsured, OMEX, was the insurer of a number of Canadian municipalities under two pool arrangements: the OMEX Program, providing liability and automobile insurance cover up to a limit of US$50m and administered by OMEX employees; and the Special Underwriting Group (SUG OMEX) Program, which was a policy with a limit of US$5m and administered by brokers JLT. Both Programs were reinsured in London with the claimant reinsurers, with JLT acting as brokers.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.