i-law

Medical Law Reports

R v Canterbury & Thanet District Health Authority, ex parte F & W; South East Thames Regional Health Authority, ex p F & W

(1994) 5 Med LR 132

CIVIL DIVISION

Lord Justice STUART-SMITH, and Mr Justice JUDGE

Judicial review — Health authorities — Complaints procedure — Duty to receive and consider complaints — Health authority's decision to abort procedure in face of legal proceedings — Whether complaints procedure inappropriate where litigation was likely — Primary purpose of procedure — Whether health authorities justified in deciding that applicant complainants should not be included in procedure — Whether health authorities” decision to abort procedure which they had set up with regard to other complainants was unreasonable — Whether regional health authority had completely divested themselves of responsibility — Exercise of court's discretion

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.