International Construction Law Review
BOOK REVIEW
HUMPHREY LLOYD
The Service Provider’s Duty to Warn about Defects Caused by Third Parties. By Joasia Lusak. The Hague, The Netherlands: Instituut voor Bouwrecht, Postbus 85851, 2508 CN. 2012. ISBN 978-90-78066-69-9. Softback. 284 pp. (inc. bibliography, tables and index). â44.95
This is a fascinating work. It is based on the author’s Ph D thesis awarded by the University of Amsterdam. Its subtitle is “A case study on the pre-contractual and contractual duty to warn in English, German and Dutch Law and in the Draft Common Frame of Reference”. The latter was published in 2009 as the work of a “Study group on a European Civil Code and the research group on EC Private Law (The Acquis Group): ‘Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference”’ (DCFR for short). It is part of work being done towards the possible harmonisation of law within the European Union. This Review has recently covered another aspect—see the paper by Professor Beno^ıt Kohl of the University of Liège about a common European sales law: [2012] ICL 253.
Based therefore on this general study Joasia Lusak examined its relevance to the construction industry in the form of the existence and scope of a duty of care for actual or potential defects or deficiencies. In what circumstances may a typical participant, such as an architect or other designer or a contractor or subcontractor, owe a duty of care? By way of illustration Joasia Lusak gives some simple examples. Here is one of them:
“A builder constructs a drainage system in accordance with the design provided to him. However, the pipes specified are wrong so the system does not function properly. The builder had noticed something might be wrong with the design when he tendered but did not raise his doubts during pre-contractual discussions with the client and the designer. Is the builder liable for breach of a pre-contractual duty to warn the client?”
The aim of the book is to present the findings of the author’s research which was directed towards establishing the existence of a specific duty to warn on the part of the service provider, i.e., not only the scope of the duty but also its existence. The author also then looked at the three different legal systems to see how each dealt with duties to warn. Thus the work provides not only some insight on the future harmonisation of the duty to warn but also practical comparisons. However, the research was not solely confined to general principles of law in relation to the duty to warn as the author also wanted to see whether the duty to warn was included in standard forms of contract currently used in the construction industry, i.e., were there express contractual obligations? She concluded that under German and Dutch law, even where the contract did not contain an explicit
Pt 2] Book Review
247