Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
LATE PAYMENT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
Peter MacDonald Eggers*
The late payment of insurance claims remains a lively topic of debate among insurance lawyers and professionals. The Law Commission has presented proposals for the reform of the law concerning the remedies available for the late payment of claims. This paper considers the current state of the law concerning the recovery of damages for the late payment of insurance claims, the Law Commission’s proposals and the policy reasons relating to law reform. The paper goes on to consider what matters should be taken into account in developing any law reform.
1. Introduction
English insurance law has attracted a considerable amount of criticism over the years, because of the perception—in some, though not all, respects fully justified—that it can operate harshly, without regard to proportion, against the assured. The development of insurance law has resulted in the formulation of principles which are unique and cannot be found elsewhere in the English law of contract. It is these highly individual principles which are targeted for reform. Of course, if the relevant principles were common to other areas of the law, one would imagine that the attack would be made not just on the law of insurance, but on the general law.
Insurance contracts are governed by general law doctrines affecting all contracts, but are also subject to rules and principles developed especially for insurance contracts. These idiosyncratic principles have been developed because of the special and peculiar nature of insurance contracts. The characteristics of insurance contracts which have resulted in these particular doctrines include the following.
The first characteristic is the fact that, by reason of the insurance contract (at least indemnity insurance contracts), the insurer agrees to bear the consequences of the assured’s suffering a defined adversity, such as a physical injury, a financial loss, a legal liability to a third party or property damage. This has been referred to as a transfer of risk, which is ordinarily borne by the assured, to the insurer.1 In most cases, one party may be legally required or compelled to assume responsibility for such consequences where that party by reason of his or her wrongful conduct or breach of duty has caused the adverse
* QC, 7 King’s Bench Walk; Visiting Fellow of the Institute of International Shipping and Trade Law, Swansea.
An earlier version of this article was presented at a symposium for market participants entitled Reforming Marine and Commercial Insurance Law, organised by the Institute of the International Shipping and Trade Law at Swansea University in collaboration with the Law Commission, which was held at the Association of British Insurers’ London headquarters on 25 April 2013.
1. MA Clarke, The Law of Insurance Contracts, 6th edn (Informa, London, 2009), [1.1(b)].
LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY
342