We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close


Maritime Letters of Indemnity




5.1 Brown Jenkinson v Percy Dalton 1 remains the leading English case regarding the unenforceability of the letters of indemnity issued against clean bills of lading for cargoes which are clearly not in apparent good order and condition on shipment. It has also been cited as authority for the proposition that such letters of indemnity are unenforceable on grounds of public policy. Most recently in The Jag Ravi,2 Brown Jenkinson was characterised by counsel for the defendant cargo receivers as an “important modern decision” establishing a public policy preventing the enforcement of a the letter of indemnity in those circumstances where the defendants were able to assert that the LOI was unenforceable on grounds that it encapsulated a fraud. Against this argument, the shipowners3 contended that the Brown Jenkinson unenforceability defence “operates within narrow limits”. They argued that a line is to be drawn between an agreement made “with the intention of one or both parties to make use of the subject-matter for an unlawful purpose, that is to say a purpose that is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy” and one where a LOI is issued where there is a good faith dispute.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?


Request a trial Find out more