Anti-discharge provisions and the purview doctrine
As explained in Chapter 14 , the rule in Holme v Brunskill
1 provides that any material variation of the terms of the underlying contract between the creditor and principal will discharge the guarantor in the case of a guarantee properly so-called, unless the guarantor consents to the amendment. A variation will not be material if it is insubstantial or cannot adversely affect the guarantor. 2
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.