Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
MARITIME TERRORISM AND THE LAW
Maritime terrorism is increasing. According to a survey published by the Rand Corporation of America, acts of terrorism will have doubled by the end of the decade. Certain facts confirm this conclusion: (a) the growing polarization in world economies between rich and poor countries; (b) the growth of religious fanaticism, which may involve disregard for human life; (c) the spread of extremist organizations willing to use force to achieve their aims; (d) the possibility that some governments may support terrorist organizations by providing money, training and sanctuary; (e) the ease with which terrorists can acquire weapons and explosives and travel quickly around the world; and (f) the notion, accepted by some groups, that ports and ships somehow equate with “the establishment” and “capitalism” and are, therefore, legitimate targets.
Given this ominous prediction, why is it that, although so many governments passionately and loudly voice their abhorrence of terrorism, it is proving so difficult to agree satisfactory counter-measures? Why is it that when a country feels goaded into taking its own retaliatory action and resorts to force it may create so much antagonism, not against the terrorist, but against itself?
The answer lies in the fundamental difference between terrorism and all other
18