i-law

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

THE POLITICALLY UNSAFE PORT

Charles G. C. H. Baker *

Paul David **

The detailed examination of whether or not a port was safe for a particular vessel at a given time is perhaps the quintessence of maritime arbitration, involving as it does the scrutiny of numerous background facts concerning the port, crucial questions of causation and the underlying relationship of owner and charterer. In most cases this last aspect has been of relatively little moment, and it may be thought there is no obvious reason for such a question as “safety” to require lengthy legal analysis.
However, lawyers recognize a good thing when they see it and have not been slow in finding any number of ways of complicating what ought to be a mainly factual exercise. This tendency has recently been supported by the House of Lords, whose decision in The Evia 1, concerning a ship trapped in Al Basrah (“Basrah”) as a result of the Iran/Iraq war, promises to throw maritime arbitrators and lawyers alike into even greater depths of legal uncertainty.
In most time or voyage charters there will be found an express term whereby the charterer is obliged to order the vessel only to ports which are safe. Clause 2 of the Baltime 1939 form is a typical example:
The vessel to be employed in lawful trades for the carriage of lawful merchandise only between good and safe ports or places where she can safely lie always afloat.
The NYPE form provides to similar effect as follows:
Vessel … to be employed … in such lawful trades, between safe port and/or ports … as the Charterers or their Agents shall direct …
Even where such obligations are not expressly mentioned, an implied duty to choose a safe port rests on a charterer whenever it falls upon him to nominate a port whether under a time or voyage charter. The classic definition of a safe port is that of Sellers, L.J., in The Eastern City 2:
… a port will not be safe unless, in the relevant period of time, the particular ship can reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship …
Most unsafe port cases are concerned solely with the marine characteristics of a port, e.g. loss or damage resulting from inoperative navigational aids, an undredged (and unmarked) “high spot” in the fairway, inadequate searoom or tugs to enable vessels to leave an exposed berth before the onset of bad weather, etc. Very occasionally, the unsafety may have nothing to do with navigational matters, and may be caused by factors outside the control of the most scrupulous port administration. For example, there may be an outbreak of plague in the area of the port.

112

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.