We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

CHAPTER 7 Discrepant declarations about containerised goods ‘… in the middle of a chain reaction’

International Trade and Carriage of Goods


Page 114

CHAPTER 7

Discrepant declarations about containerised goods ‘… in the middle of a chain reaction’

Discrepant declarations about containerised goods ‘… in the middle of a chain reaction’

Professor Dr Olivier Cachard
1

Standards in shipping sometimes share the same destiny as standards in pop music: they create a sense of familiarity and broad knowledge, although part of the wording is out of reach of our minds. If some of us share the memories of Diana Ross singing Chain Reaction in 1985, absolutely all of us are conscious that, from about the same time, containerisation has dramatically been changing the course of trade in goods and even commodities. But the answer of the international community to this revolution has been rather limited. The UN Convention on International Multimodal Transport of Goods, adopted in high hopes in 1980, never came into force. The Rotterdam Rules have been depicted as ‘minimal music’ by Ralph de Wit;2 their entry into effect remains in the future (and the balance). Even in civil law countries where neat conceptualisation is usually cherished, legal science has also played ‘minimal music’. The nearest anyone describing the legal nature of the container came to precision came in the (supposedly) comic statement that it was un truc avec des machins dedans.3

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more