Transnational Construction Arbitration
Page 263
Index
Index
- abuse of process 12.1–12.39;
- arbitral institutions 4.1–4.50;
- amendments to case, and 4.22;
- arbitrator’s fees 4.18, 4.19;
- arbitration in modern era 4.6–4.11;
- authorisation of agreement, and 4.23;
- capping of fees 4.19;
- challenges to arbitrators 4.24–4.27;
- charge on time basis 4.18, 4.19;
- City of London Chamber of Arbitration 4.4;
- conduct of arbitration 4.12–4.15;
- courts issuing restraining orders, and 4.40;
- decisions on challenges to tribunals 4.27;
- discretionary powers 4.15;
- ethics and conduct of advocate 4.28–4.31;
- examination of awards 4.33;
- fraud or malpractice in course of arbitration, and 4.49;
- function of arbitration rules 4.43;
- fund holding 4.16, 4.17;
- ICC 4.1, 4.2;
- institutional rules 4.12–4.15;
- interest on deposits 4.16, 4.17;
- intervention of foreign court, and 4.41;
- LCIA 4.1;
- list of issues to be determined 4.20;
- mandatory use of FIDIC forms of contract, and 4.45;
- need for 4.9;
- origin 4.1–4.5;
- origin of terms of reference 4.21;
- potential for ethical problems 4.29;
- powers 4.11;
- regulation, case for 4.50;
- rise of 4.1–4.50;
- role of 4.1–4.50;
- scrutiny of awards 4.32–4.38;
- special procedures 4.5;
- terms of reference 4.20–4.23;
- UNCITRAL 4.6–4.8, 4.10
- arbitration: advantages 1.2, 1.3–1.6;
- cause of action estoppel 12.15
- complex arbitrations administration under ICC Rules 6.8–6.10;
- consolidation of related claims 5.1–5.53;
- arbitral institutions creating common rules 5.43, 5.44;
- consumer protection 5.11;
- current arbitration mechanisms 5.4–5.6;
- embedding new approach 5.49–5.52;
- enforcement only against true party 5.10;
- exclusion of Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.12;
- multilateral contracts 5.31–5.42;
- opt in multi party arbitration 5.25;
- party consent and the voluntary principle 5.8;
- procedural privity 5.9;
- representative proceedings 5.45–5.48;
- representative proceedings and opt out systems 5.26, 5.27;
- revisiting party consent 5.28–5.30;
- section 8 (1), Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.13–5.20;
- section 8 (2), Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.21–5.24;
- voluntary principle 5.1, 5.2;
- way ahead 5.3
- DAB: claims procedure 13.134, 13.135;
- Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board 13.128–13.133;
- FIDIC December 2016 revision 13.125–13.135;
- FIDIC drafting 13.112, 13.113;
- FIDIC time bar 13.134, 13.135;
- gateway to arbitration 13.111–13.124;
- law governing 13.136–13.149;
- mandatory procedures 13.111;
- new Yellow Book 13.125–13.127;
- Peterborough City Council v Enterprise Managed Services Ltd 13.114–13.119;
- Swiss judgment 13.120–13.124;
- three-stage test to determine governing law 13.140
- delay analysis 7.28–7.37;
- as planned v as built 7.53–7.55;
- ‘but for’ approach to adding delays 7.59–7.61;
- collapsed as built 7.62–7.64;
- concurrency of delay events 7.37;
- determining completion 7.35;
- effective articulation of results 7.70–7.72;
- expert witness, and 7.28–7.31;
- identifying baseline 7.33, 7.34;
- impacted as planned 7.56;
- languages 7.30;
- manipulation of schedules 7.36;
- pragmatic technique 7.67–7.69;
- quality of records and information 7.29;
- Scott Schedule 7.48;
- sequential addition of delays 7.57, 7.58;
- substantiating facts 7.28;
- techniques 7.47–7.69;
- time impact analysis 7.65, 7.66;
- working to a timescale – proportionality 7.31, 7.32
-
Page 264
- dispute boards 13.1–13.153;
- additional expense, as 13.150;
- adjudication in England, and 13.9–13.21;
- benefits 13.31–13.38, 13.153;
- CDBs 13.29, 13.30;
- civil law 13.7, 13.8;
- common law 13.4–13.6;
- cost 13.151;
- DABs 13.24–13.27;
- demand for amicable dispute resolution 13.9–13.15;
- disadvantages 13.39–13.45;
- DRB or DAB 13.28;
- DRBs 13.23;
- emergency arbitration, and 15.24–15.32;
- enforcement of decisions 13.109, 13.110;
- English adjudication enforcement 13.16–13.21;
- FIDIC 13.52;
- Gold Book 13.59–13.62;
- informal advice 13.33;
- jurisdiction 13.103;
- legal basis for 13.3;
- members 13.63–13.99;
- see also dispute board members;
- nature of 13.1, 13.2;
- preconditions for referral to 13.100–13.102;
- Red Book 13.53;
- referral of disputes to 13.100–13.108;
- Silver Book 13.54–13.58;
- time limits 13.104–13.108;
- types 13.22–13.30;
- use of 13.46–13.51, 13.152;
- Yellow Book 13.54–13.58
- dispute resolution mechanisms 1.7
- emergency arbitration 15.1–15.37;
- applicability 15.1–15.37;
- contractually agreed negotiations, and 15.33–15.36;
- cooling-off periods, and 15.33–15.36;
- development 15.4–15.8;
- dispute boards 15.24–15.32;
- effectiveness 15.1–15.37;
- effects 15.13–15.20;
- interplay with other pre-arbitral mechanisms 15.1–15.37;
- legal nature 15.13–15.20;
- mediation, and 15.33–15.36;
- other prearbitral relief, and 15.21–15.36;
- overview of procedures 15.9–15.12
- enforcement of DAB decisions under FIDIC 1999 forms of contract 14.1–14.125;
- argument against final award enforcing DABs decision 14.99–14.103;
- arguments in favour of final award as issue of non payment resolved finally 14.104–14.107;
- binding DAB decision interim relief, whether 14.90, 14.91;
- concept of inherent premise 14.44–14.51;
- damages amounting to interest only 14.32;
- damages for breach of contract 14.29;
- damages include principal sum 14.33, 14.34;
- dispute capable of referral under sub clause 20.6 14.23–14.26;
- effect of NOD 14.64–14.67;
- effect of wording in Gold Book/Guidance Memorandum 14.115–14.118;
- exercise of power by arbitral tribunal 14.59–14.63;
- FIDIC 1999 wording 14.11–14.15;
- FIDIC Gold Book 14.113;
- FIDIC Guidance Memorandum 14.40–14.43;
- final award for relief that is not final 14.92–14.98;
- issues 14.16–14.22;
- loss flowing from breach of contract 14.31;
- one dispute or two dispute approach 14.71–14.80;
- practical difficulty 14.52;
- rationale of DAB 14.4, 14.5;
- referral of both primary and secondary disputes 14.68–14.80;
- secondary dispute referred to DAB prior to referral to arbitration 14.35–14.39;
- specific performance 14.53–14.58;
- terminology of award 14.84–14.89;
- types of dispute board 14.2;
- what cause of action 14.27–14.63;
- what sort of award 14.81–14.112;
- whether failure to pay amounts to breach of contract 14.30
- enforcement of foreign arbitral awards 10.1–10.70;
- developments 10.1–10.70;
- enforcement of lookalikes 10.40–10.67;
- evolution of ADR 10.40–10.58;
- failure to comply with dispute adjudication board’s decision 10.47;
- final and binding DAB decisions enforceable under New York Convention 10.59–10.67;
- mechanics of New York Convention 10.3–10.12;
- obtaining dispute adjudication board’s decision 10.46;
- prospectives 10.1–10.70;
- public policy scrutiny 10.13–10.25;
- recognition and enforcement of awards annulled at place of arbitration 10.26–10.39
- expert witnesses 7.1–7.73;
- common issues faced on complex capital projects 7.13–7.18;
- delay, and 7.1–7.73;
- delay analysis 7.28–7.37;
- see also delay analysis;
- delay analysis methods 7.44–7.46;
- delay analysis techniques 7.47–7.69;
- disruption, and 7.1–7.73;
- example of probabilistic model output 7.40;
- independence 7.4–7.7;
- multiple stakeholders with conflicting interests 7.13;
- nature of construction projects, and 7.8–7.12;
- project management of evidence process 7.25;
- quantum issues 7.1–7.73;
- role in construction arbitration 7.1–7.73;
- scope of work 7.19–7.24;
- skills shortages, effect of 7.14, 7.15;
- sound governance, importance of 7.16–7.18;
- uncertainty in forecasting outcomes 7.38–7.43
- expropriation of contractual rights in investment treaty arbitration 9.1–9.58;
- breaches of other treaty standards 9.26–9.28;
- contractual non-performance 9.41–9.47;
- failure to take action 9.48–9.51;
- general principles 9.4–9.7;
-
Page 265
- series of acts taken against investment 9.52–9.55;
- sovereign capacity 9.13–9.21;
- sovereign right to regulate/legislate 9.22–9.25;
- termination of contracts 9.29–9.40
- investment 8.1–8.48;
- construction contracts constituting 8.27–8.31;
- construction projects versus stand-alone engineering contracts 8.37–8.45;
- definition 8.4–8.25;
- definitions of foreign investment in investment treaties 8.11–8.13;
- definitions of foreign investment under ICSID Convention 8.14–8.25;
- foreign investments in proceedings constructed according to ICSID Convention 8.4–8.10;
- Salini text 8.18, 8.19;
- when construction contracts have not constituted 8.32–8.36
- investment treaty arbitrations 8.1–8.48;
- issue estoppel 12.1–12.39
- joinder of additional parties 5.1–5.53;
- arbitral institutions creating common rules 5.43, 5.44;
- consumer protection 5.11;
- current arbitration mechanisms 5.4–5.6;
- embedding new approach 5.49–5.52;
- enforcement only against true party 5.10;
- exclusion of Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.12;
- multilateral contracts 5.31–5.42;
- opt in multi-party arbitration 5.25;
- party consent and the voluntary principle 5.8;
- procedural privity 5.9;
- representative proceedings 5.45–5.48;
- representative proceedings and opt out systems 5.26, 5.27;
- revisiting party consent 5.28–5.30;
- section 8 (1), Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.13–5.20;
- section 8 (2), Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 5.21–5.24;
- voluntary principle 5.1, 5.2;
- way ahead 5.3
- law governing arbitration agreement 2.1–2.47;
- absence of choice of seat 2.46;
- choice of transitional principles 2.27;
- common intent of parties 2.32;
- development of non discrimination principle by national laws 2.46;
- doctrine of separability 2.6;
- domestic legislatures 2.7;
- drafting solution 2.1, 2.2;
- estoppel principle 2.41–2.44, 2.46;
- first candidate approach 2.10–2.17;
- French law 2.30–2.32;
- French transnational rules 2.30–2.34;
- German Federal Supreme Court 2.35;
- implied choice of parties 2.15, 2.16;
- law applicable to main contract 2.10–2.17;
- law of the seat 2.18–2.25;
- matrix of laws 2.5;
- national law, rules of 2.47;
- nature of agreement 2.6;
- New York Convention 2.8, 2.9;
- no choice of law, where 2.22;
- non discrimination principle 2.38–2.40;
- overcoming challenges of transnational approach 2.36–2.45;
- parties choosing seat of arbitration in agreement 2.46;
- proper law of the contract 2.11;
- second candidate approach 2.18–2.25;
- separate inquiry, need for 2.5–2.9;
- special rules 2.6;
- third candidate approach 2.26–2.35;
- transnational approach 2.26–2.35;
- UNCITRAL Model Law 2.8;
- validation principle 2.45, 2.46
- Middle East 11.1–11.88;
- recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards see recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Middle East
- multi-party arbitration 6.1–6.79;
- administration of complex arbitrations under ICC Rules 6.8–6.10;
- agreement to consolidate 6.57–6.61;
- appointment of arbitrators 6.34;
- automatic nature of joinder 6.11–6.15;
- claims 6.35–6.48;
- consolidation 6.53–6.75;
- different arbitration agreements 6.65–6.68;
- discretional nature of decision to consolidate 6.69–6.73;
- formalities of consolidation 6.74–6.75;
- institutional rules, under 6.1–6.79;
- institutional rules on complex arbitrations 6.5, 6.6;
- joinder of additional parties 6.11–6.34;
- multi-contract arbitrations 6.49–6.52;
- procedure for claims 6.41–6.48;
- procedure for joinder 6.16–6.30;
- purpose of claims 6.35–6.40;
- purpose of consolidation 6.53–6.56;
- requirements for joinder 6.31–6.33;
- same arbitration agreement 6.62–6.64;
- scope of claims 6.35–6.40
- multi-tier dispute resolution clauses 3.1–3.34;
- ‘an attempt at conciliation’ 3.28, 3.29;
- clarity and certainty of obligations 3.18–3.20;
- condition precedent to arbitration 3.25, 3.30;
- dispute resolution process, and 3.8;
- drafting 3.34;
- enforceability 3.9–3.30;
- enforcement in public interest 3.22;
- FIDIC fourth edition 3.4;
- good faith, and 3.24, 3.26;
- hurdles 3.5;
- ICC standard clause 3.3;
- main issues 3.7;
- mediation process, and 3.11–3.15;
- obligation to negotiate 3.31;
- over elaborate drafting 3.6;
- prior steps 3.17;
- problems with 3.5–3.8;
- stay of proceedings, and 3.33;
- typical clauses 3.3, 3.4
-
Page 266
- ADGM 11.26–11.37;
- AOIC 11.83;
- applications for nullification 11.13–11.21;
- curial assistance in enforcement 11.40–11.43;
- DIFC 11.26–11.37;
- domestic awards 11.8–11.43;
- domestic ratification processes 11.8–11.12;
- enforcement in and through free zones 11.66–11.70;
- enforcement in or through free zones 11.25–11.39;
- enforcement through Special Tribunals 11.22–11.24;
- foreign awards 11.44–11.70;
- GCC Convention 11.51–11.53;
- ICAL 11.48;
- ICSID awards 11.75–11.77;
- investment arbitration awards 11.71–11.84;
- multilateral regional enforcement investments 11.4;
- nature of jurisdiction 11.2, 11.3;
- New York Convention 11.54–11.60;
- non ICSID awards 11.78–11.81;
- public policy considerations 11.13–11.21;
- public policy exception 11.61–11.65;
- QFC 11.38, 11.39;
- regional and international enforcement instruments 11.50–11.60;
- Riyadh Convention 11.51–11.53;
- test of reciprocity 11.46, 11.47;
- UAIACA 11.82;
- UNCITRAL Model Law 11.45
- remedies at seat 12.1–12.39;
-
res judicata
12.1–12.39;
- effect of foreign judgement in England and Wales 12.14