We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

CHAPTER 5 Delay and disruption money claims

Litigation in the technology and construction court

Page 75 CHAPTER 5 Delay and disruption money claims Introduction 5.1 Delay-related money claims could be made by either the contractor or the employer. They could also be claims under the contract (made pursuant to a specific provision) or in damages at common law, for breach. Different considerations apply to each type of claim, but one important piece of practical advice applies to both: start with the money. In order to recover the claimed sum, it will be necessary to demonstrate that (1) the losses claimed have in fact been incurred 1 and (2) those losses were caused by the specific event or breach relied on. It is much easier to focus properly on those hurdles if one starts with the actual losses and works backwards to the event/breach, as further described below. Further, it cannot be over-emphasised that contemporaneous documentary evidence is essential. ‘A party to a dispute, particularly if there is an arbitration will learn three lessons (often too late) the importance of records, the importance of records and the importance of records.’ 2

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more