Serious irregularity: failure to consider all issues
and Another v Rose  EWHC 1176 (Ch),
HHJ Russen QC considered a series of arguments by the claimant, asserting that
the arbitrator was guilty of serious irregularity under section 68(2)(d) of the
1996 Act by failing to consider all of the issues put to him. The judge
concluded that there was no merit in any of the arguments.
: the facts
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.