We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

R (ON THE APPLICATION OF CRITCHLEY) v FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LTD BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC (TRADING AS HALIFAX) (FIRST INTERESTED PARTY) THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY (SECOND INTERESTED PARTY)

LLR: Insurance & Reinsurance Plus

R (ON THE APPLICATION OF CRITCHLEY) v FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LTD BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC (TRADING AS HALIFAX) (FIRST INTERESTED PARTY) THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY (SECOND INTERESTED PARTY)

[2020] Lloyd's Rep. IR Plus 9

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (ADMINISTRATIVE COURT)

Before Mrs Justice Lang

Insurance (payment protection insurance) – Allegation of mis-selling – Complaint dismissed by Financial Ombudsman Service – Judicial review – Whether Ombudsman decision perverse or irrational – Utmost good faith – Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 228(2) – Financial Conduct Authority Handbook DISP.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more