We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

Property damage: successive losses

Insurance Law Monthly

Property damage: successive losses

The consecutive earthquakes in New Zealand in 2010 and 2011 have given rise to a mass of important litigation on the measure of indemnity in property cases. One of the key issues has been whether an assured can recover loss separately for each earthquake.

All turns on the wording of the policy, and it is now accepted that there can be more than one claim for unrepaired loss only where the policy responds to each loss separately or where there is a reinstatement of cover following each loss. Neither of those conditions were satisfied in Mathieson v Tower Insurance Ltd [2020] NZHC 136.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more