Part 8 not appropriate to determine nature, scope and extent of common law duty of care
RSK Environment Ltd v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd  EWHC 2049 (TCC) O’Farrell J held that the claimant was not entitled to a declaration that, to the extent that it owed
a common law duty of care to the defendant in respect of a ground investigation which it had carried out and a report which
it had issued, the nature, scope and extent of any such duty was circumscribed by the limitation of liability provisions in
a proposal document which it had issued to another party also involved in the development. The claim was held to be one that
was not suitable for determination by way of Pt 8 proceedings because the contractual matrix between the parties was in dispute
and the court could not determine the issues which it had been asked to determine without proper findings as to the nature
of the relationships between the parties and the construction of the terms of any such contract or contracts.
The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online
If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.