We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies. Close

CHAPTER 7 Hull and machinery insurance and delay considerations

Insurance Law Implications of Delay in Maritime Transport

Page 112 CHAPTER 7 Hull and machinery insurance and delay considerations Introduction 7.1 The MIA 1906 provides that an insurer of a ship is not liable for any loss proximately caused by delay, although the delay is caused by a peril insured against. 1 The common law origin of the provision goes back to Shelbourne v Law 2 where it was held that loss of earnings due to detention and delay of a vessel during repairs necessitated by a collision are not recoverable under a hull and machinery policy. The origin was therefore with respect to the exclusion of this type of consequential losses arising from delay from the scope of hull and machinery policies. In Phoenix Shipping Co v Apex Shipping Corp 3 it was enunciated:

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, please enter your details below to log in.

Enter your email address to log in as a user on your corporate account.
Remember me on this computer

Not yet an i-law subscriber?

Devices

Request a trial Find out more