i-law

Personal Injury Compensation

Court involvement in decisions for people between 16 and 18

AB v CD and Others [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam); [2021] Med LR 365

The second case clarified the scope of the decision in the Bell case. It concerned an application by AB, the mother of XY, for a Declaration that she and CD (XY’s father) had the ability in law to consent on behalf of XY to the administration of puberty blockers without the need for a best interests decision by the court.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.