Unmanned Ships and the Law
Page 157
Index
- accuracy 121
- ACTUV see Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program
- Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications (AAWA) 37
- AGI see Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)
- AI see artificial intelligence (AI)
- American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) 38
- Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program 39
- Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) 55
- artificial intelligence (AI) 44, 52
- algorithms 55–57
- concept and definition 53–54
- deep learning and machine learning 55
- types 54–55
- Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) 55
- Athens Convention 6, 7
- automated ship 52–53, 65
- automatic systems 43, 48
- automation 26, 43, 72
- categorisation for 51–53
- levels/degrees 147–149
- automationworthiness 73, 76
- Autonomy Assisted Bridge (AAB) 44
- autonomy/autonomous 43–44
- level of 44–45
- scope of 45
- Black, C. 10
- Brazil 21
- Britannica 54
- capacity to carry 11–15
- capacity to navigate 6, 9, 15–16
- cargoworthiness 72, 76–77
- carriage 6
- carriage of goods 11–13
- carriage of passengers 13–15
- carrier 119
- liability regime 124–125
- limitation of liability 129–130
- carrier shipowner 69–70
- carriers’ liability 129–130
- “channelling of liability” 33
- Chen, X. 10
- chief controller 86, 98
- China 21, 35
- Chorley, R. S. 10
- collision avoidance sensors 53
- Committee Maritime International (CMI) 28–31
- communicationworthiness 73, 74, 88, 88n5
- connectivity manager 59
- connectivity system 57
- availability 59–60
- capacity 60
- latency 60–61
- redundancy 60
- security 61
- “Constrained Autonomous” 48
- contract 96
- control centre (CC): applicable algorithms 88
- board a ship 106–107
- command post 87
- communicationworthiness 88
- construction 115
- contracting party causes damage to third parties 128
- contracting party suffers damage 127–128
- controlling 87, 89
- data collection 91
- entrepreneur 128
- governmental agency 105
- independent contractor 104–105, 118, 128
- on land 99–100
- legal/administrative duties 91–93
- legal nature 95–97
- legal status 94–95, 105
- liability regime 125–128
- local rules 106
- monitoring 87, 89
- navigating 90–91
- operator 104
- organisation 97–99
- overview 84–86
- principal values/interests 150–152
- public entity 118–119
- recipient shipowner 118
- safety measures 102–103
- on sea 101–102
- seaworthiness 82–83, 149–150
- shipowner 103–104, 117–118
- shipowner causes damage to third parties 127
- shipowner suffers damage 127
- situated on land 106
- supervision 87
- terminology 86–87
- controllers 86
- conventional-looking unit 42
- “core personnel” 27
- Croatia 21
- cybernetics 23
- data integrity 61
- “Decision Support” 48
- deep learning 55
- distress 62
- docking/undocking 26
- Doctrine of Stages 78
- Dothan, S. 137n3
- Earth Station 59
- economy 26–27
- “e-doc” format 34
- existence 121
- exoneration from liability 116, 135
- The Falco 37–38
- fault liability 109
- Finferries 37–38
- Finland 35
- floatability 1
- fully autonomous ship 30, 48, 49, 67–68
- Giles, O. C. 10
- Gilmore, G. 10
- “Global Maritime Distress and Safety System” (GMDSS) 58
- “GMDSS Satellite Communication Service Providers” (SSP) 58
- high-tech communication systems 57–58
- connections 62–63
- connectivity system 59–61
- objectives/purposes 62
- organisation 58–59
- standards 61
- “holistic” approach 35
- Hosseinnejad, K. 137n4
- Höyhtyä, M. 59
- hyper-intelligent software 56
- In-House CC 117
- insurance 113, 143
- direct action against the insurer 153–154
- duty of fair presentation of the risk 154–155
- parties 152
- perils of the sea 144–145
- principal values/interests 146–152
- insurance certificate 34–35
- international carriage of goods: by air 129, 133
- by rail 129, 133
- by road 129, 133
- by sea 130, 134
- International Maritime Organisation (IMO) 28–31
- International Working Group (IWG) 28
- joint liability principle 120
- Kennedy, W. R. 10
- Kimbell, J. 10
- land unit 42–43
- Law of Obligations 109
- Legal Nature of Liability 113, 114–116
- level of autonomy 44–45
- by IMO 49–51
- by ISO 49
- by Lloyd's Register 46–47
- by Maritime UK 47–48
- by Norwegian Forum 48
- liability regime: applicability 113–114
- carrier 124–125
- contractual relation 117–118
- control centre 125–128
- exoneration from 116, 135
- full and complete redress 109
- institutional/organisational relation 117
- legal nature and characteristics 112–116
- limitation of liability 128–132
- loss of right to limit 133–135
- in maritime law 110–112
- operator 123
- owner 120–122
- principle 108–109
- statutory relation 118–119
- subject of liability 119–128
- limitation of liability 109, 113, 128–132
- carriers 129–130
- of shipowners 130–132
- unmanned ship operations 132
- local authorities 19
- machine learning 55
- marine adventure 143
- Maritime Anonymous Surface Ship (MASS) 2, 17, 29, 30, 31
- Maritime Mobile Terminal 59
- Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) 28, 29
- Maritime Unmanned Navigation through Intelligence Networks (MUNIN) 38–39
- MAS400 see Mayflower
- MASS see Maritime Anonymous Surface Ship (MASS)
- “MASS Code” 35
- master, role and responsibility of 31–32
- Mayflower 36–37
- Meeson, N. 10, 10
- mixed contract 97
- mobile satellite communication system 58–59
- Natural Language Processing (NLP) 54
- Norway 35
- NOVel Iwt and MARitime transport concepts (NOVIMAR) project 40–41
- “operate in the marine environment” 8
- operator 119
- perils of the sea 144–145
- Questions of Liability 33–34
- Regulatory Scoping Exercise (RSE) 29, 30, 31
- remote control system: monitoring 63
- organisation 63–64
- power and authority 64–68
- remotely controlled ship 30, 52, 66–67
- remote operator, role and responsibility of 32–33
- remote pilotaging systems 25
- robotics 25
- Rolls Royce 37–38
- Rose, F. D. 10, 10
- Safer Vessel with Autonomous Navigation (SVAN) 37
- safety: on board 25
- on land 25
- protection of environment 26
- risks 25–26
- underlying idea 23–25
- safety message 62
- SART see Search and Rescue Transponder (SART)
- scope of autonomy 45
- “sea-going vessel” 8
- Sea Hunter 39–40
- Search and Rescue Transponder (SART) 58
- seaworthiness: carrier shipowner 69–70
- concept and definition 70–73
- control centre 149–150
- with regard to bunkering 78
- with regard to documentation 78
- with regard to holds 76–77
- with regard to loading and discharging 77
- with regard to stowage 77–78
- with regard to the crew 74–76
- with regard to the vessel 73–74
- with respect to control centre 82–83
- rules 68–69
- security 61
- self-steering ship 20, 125
- “semi-autonomous ship with seafarers on board” 49
- service contract 96
- service provider 96
- service units 86
- shipowners’ liability 130–132
- ship seaworthy 79
- continuous nature of obligation 79–81
- to exercise due diligence 81–82
- relative nature of obligation 81
- “Shore Control Centre” 42
- Space Segment 59
- SSP see “GMDSS Satellite Communication Service Providers (SSP)”
- strict liability 109, 113, 114–116
- strong AI 55
- superior authority 87, 90, 98
- supervisor 98
- support group 87
- SVAN see Safer Vessel with Autonomous Navigation (SVAN)
- Svitzer Hermod 38
- Terrestrial Networks 59
- tortoise syndrome 12
- 2002 London Protocol 7
- United Kingdom 35
- urgency message 62
- Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) 35
- vessel train concept 40
- vicarious liability 108
- Visby Rules 5, 75, 134
- visibility 121
- voyageworthiness 71, 72, 74
- Wärtsilä Remote Pilotage Project 41
- weak AI 55
- Wikipedia 54
- Yara Birkeland 35–36, 77