Causation in Insurance Contract Law
Index
- abandonment, notice of 53, 188
- ‘a cause’ test 153, 163–165
- accident compensation system 77
- accidents: all-risk insurance 144; fortuitous 131–132, 151, 185; Inchmaree Clause 158, 162; injuries or death and 67; life cover 165–167; non-marine insurance 165–167; road, liability for 77; Walkhem's interpretation of 69
- actual causation 11, 22–27, 37, 168
- actual total loss (ATL) 52–53, 179
- actuarial vision of insurance 42
- agents 158, 173, 176, 189
- aggregation clause 194–195, 197–203
- aircraft and spare parts, seizure of 116
- “all or nothing” approach 93, 95, 136–140, 142, 143
- all-risk policy 4, 35, 144–146, 150, 183–184, 187, 215–217, 223–224, 227–229; accidents 144; contractual interpretation 146
- Andrew, Smith J. 221
- anti-concurrent causes clause 142–143
- apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 188–192
- ‘arising from’, definition of 60, 65
- ‘arising out of’, definition of 56, 60, 62–65, 173
- assured's duty of fair presentation 9, 235–237
- assured's non-compliance 234–235
- ‘attributable to’, definition of 58, 162, 164–165
- Australia: ‘arising out of’, definition of 63; burden and standard of proof 208, 224; business interruption cover 171–172; concurrent causes 133, 137; contextual interpretation and common-sense principles 33; FCA test 171–172; foreseeability 102; industrial special risks insurance policy 183; Insurance Contracts Act 1984 233; Marine Insurance Act 1909 40–41; nature of subject matter insured 183; voyage 186; warranties, breach of 233
- Bacon's Maxim 40, 44, 106
- Bailhache, J. 210, 214
- bailment 112
- Baker, T. 42
- balance of probabilities 83, 85–86, 88, 91–95, 98, 206–215, 218–219, 221–224, 229
- barratry 46–47, 147, 155, 159, 209–210, 211n35
- Belgium 135
- Bennett, H. 151, 153, 164
- beyond Reasonable doubt 206, 208, 210
- bill of lading 158
- Birks, P. 11
- Black's law dictionary 123
- Branson, J. 211
- breakage and leakage 133, 180–181
- breakdown of machinery 51–52, 155–157
- burden of proof 160, 205–229; all-risk policy 215–217, 223–224, 227–229; assured, burden on 212–213, 225; Australia 208, 224; balance of probabilities 83, 85–86, 88, 91–95, 98, 206–215, 218–219, 221–224, 229; beyond reasonable doubt 206, 208, 210; but-for test 78, 84, 87, 89; cause-in-fact 219; cause-in-law 219; circumstantial evidence 227; common sense approach 224; concurrent causes 215; factual causation 220; fortuity 208–209, 211, 216–217, 221, 225; generic perils 215–217; inherent vice 223; insured perils 205–210, 212–215, 217, 220–221, 224–225, 229; insurers, on 214–215, 229; insuring clauses 228; loss of a chance 93–94; marine risks 84, 85–87, 89–95; materiality 206, 218–219; mysterious disappearance clauses 216, 227–229; non-insured or excluded perils 214–215, 221; perils of the sea 213, 216–218, 220–221, 225–226, 205, 217–218, 220, 225–227, 229; proximate cause 206, 215, 221–224, 229; resumption of innocence 208, 210, 226; seaworthiness 217–218, 220, 224–227, 229; secondary burden 213; standard of proof 78, 91, 206–209, 212, 224; unexplainable losses 217–229; warranties 213; war risks policy 210, 214n52
- burst pipes 126
- business interruption cover 55, 70–74, 170–172; Australia 171–172; COVID-19 170–172; FCA test 170–172
- Butcher, J. 201
- but-for test 23, 70–76; ‘attributable to’, definition of 163; burden of proof 78, 84, 87, 89; cause-in-fact 78–79, 83, 88, 91, 94; common sense approach 101; concurrent causes 82–83, 109, 115, 116, 119–122, 128, 138; factual causation 88, 100; failure 84–96; financial gains cases 95–96; foreseeability 80, 101–102; inevitable consequence test 53; interpretation 78, 83–87, –91, 99; liability insurance 96–101; loss of a chance 92–95; material contribution 84, 85–87, 89–95; medical negligence 78, 85–87, 92–96; operation 78–83; proximate cause 50–53, 96–97, 119; remoteness 101–102; seaworthiness 160–162; tort law 77–102, 193; warranties, breach of 235, 236; what or who caused loss 79; wilful misconduct 163, 175–176
- Calabresi, G. 42
- Canada 169, 189
- capture, confiscation and seizure 46, 53–54, 79, 106, 147, 159, 178, 183, 188
- cargo insurance 145, 178, 185–186; see also Institute Cargo Clauses
- Catastrophe Clause 172
- catastrophe reinsurance policy 173n133
- causa causans 49, 67
- causae sine qua non 74, 140, 163
- causal connection test 8, 232–233, 235–237, 239; warranties, breach of 232–233, 235–237, 239
- causal involvement test 29
- causal limitation 7–8, 27, 29, 31; warranties 233
- causal selection test 27, 29
- Causa proxima non remota spectatur principle 44–45
- cause-and-effect 1, 49–50, 53, 75
- ‘caused by’, definition of 50–54, 57–67
- cause-in-fact 6, 12, 23, 31, 38, 43, 194, 197; bifurcation 24–30, 55; burden of proof 219; but-for test 78–79, 83, 88, 91, 94; counterfactual dependence 70, 78; intervening causes 68
- cause-in-law 6, 12, 38, 43, 194, 197; bifurcation 24–30, 55; burden of proof 219; but-for test 78, 88; counterfactual dependence 72; inevitable consequence test 74; intervening causes 68
- The Cendor MOPU 144, 164, 185–186, 188; common-sense principles 18; concurrent causes 104, 109–110, 113, 121, 129, 131–135, 139; exclusions 174; external factors 129, 131–134; independent operations 121; inherent vice 4, 110, 129, 131–134; internal causes 132–134; internal factors 129, 131–134; interpretation and causation 36; ‘leg-breaking wave’ 18, 61, 110; nature of subject matter insured 180–181, 185–186, 188; perils of the sea 4, 61, 151–154; proximate cause 4; test of causation 162
- certainty: all risks 183; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 189; burden of proof 207, 211, 217–219, 223; but-for test 90, 93–94; fortuity 185; loss of a chance 92; time order test 48; unexplainability 217–219
- Chalmers, M. 4–5, 40, 43, 105, 160, 161
- Chalmers’ Marine Insurance Act 1906 105n15
- chance, loss of a see loss of a chance
- charterparties 47, 108, 111–112, 158, 162, 179
- Chinese maritime courts 129–130
- circumstantial evidence 227
- Clarke, M. 75, 199
- clause 90; aggregation 194–195, 197–203; negligence 108, 156–158; perils of the sea 48, 156, 158; pollution 150; proximate cause 158–160; repairs 178, 186; trends clauses 3, 28, 71–74, 194–197, 204; warlike operations 108
- clinical negligence 41, 78, 85–87, 92–96
- Colinvaux's law of insurance 227
- collateral lies, fraudulent claims vs. 237–239
- collisions: apportionment 142; delay 178; detention 106; fault 146; liability 150; maritime perils 147; perils of the sea 151
- Colman, J. 210, 221
- combined causes see concurrent causes
- common law 43–44, 88, 90–91, 94, 170, 172
- common-sense principles 28–30, 37–39, 44, 107, 146; application 17, 29–30; burden of proof 224; The Cendor MOPU 18; concurrent causes 107, 110, 114, 119, 131; contextual interpretation and 33–34; contractual interpretation 30; interpreting cause of loss 146, 181, 184–185; notion of causation 12–13; recent developments 20; series of questions about 16
- competing theories 224, 229
- compulsory insurance 62, 77, 97
- concurrent causes 67, 82–83, 103–143; “all or nothing” approach 93, 95, 136–140, 142, 143; anti-concurrent causes clause 142–143; apportionment 108, 124–127, 129, 136, 140–142; Australia 133, 137; burden of proof 215; but-for test 82–83, 109, 115, 116, 119–122, 128, 138; The Cendor MOPU 104, 109–110, 113, 121, 129, 131–135, 139; combination of all competing causes 106–107, 119; common sense approach 107, 110, 114, 119, 131; contractual interpretation 104, 113; cumulative damage 123; definition 103–105, 104, 114–125; dominant causes 105, 107; effective cause 111–113, 127; efficiency test 55, 103–104, 107, 121; English cases, rules established by landmark 104, 118, 135; equal efficiency 103–104, 107, 109, 114, 118–123, 124–127, 132, 141, 143; FCA test 103–104, 113, 120, 122, 128; independent operations 121; indispensable contribution to each cause 122, 125; insured perils 103–106, 104–105, 108, 110, 113–114, 116, 118, 121, 125–128, 133–134, 142; insuring clauses 139; intention 103, 107, 111, 116, 136–140; interdependent causes 119, 122, 128, 141; internal causes and external causes 129–135; interpretation 104, 111, 113–114, 123, 125, 136–139, 141, 143; liability insurance 136; marine insurance 105–112, 105–114, 129–130, 137, 140; marine risks 117, 141; necessary condition test 115, 119–121, 141–142; new clauses, wording of 142; non-insured or excluded perils 114, 125, 126–127, 133–135, 139, 142; Norwegian insurance law 141–142; one peril that falls into more than one heading of peril 118; overlap in coverage 116–117, 127, 132; precedents 103–105; proximate cause 103–143; sole causes 67, 104, 106–108, 107, 109, 111–112, 115, 125, 133; time order test 106–107; tort law 36, 82–83, 136; two independent perils of equal efficiency 118–123; war risks policy 108, 116–117, 141, 147
- confiscation, capture and seizure 46, 53–54, 79, 106, 147, 159, 178, 183, 188
- ‘consequences of’, definition of 60–61
- ‘consequent upon’, definition of 60
- construction see interpretation
- constructive total loss (CTL) 52, 53, 179, 188, 191
- Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 230
- contract 2–3, 8–9, 65–67; affreightment 184; all-risk insurance 146; apprehension of peril 191–192; but-for test 70; ‘caused by’, definition of 62; Clause 158; concurrent causes 118, 127–129, 136–139, 142; freedom of contract 137, 139; insurance contract law 77–91, 97–91; loss of a chance 92–95; marine risks 148–150; perils of the sea 151; reinsurance 172–173; sale 4; shipbuilding 148; variations 160, 163, 165; see-also standard terms; warranties; breach of
- contractual interpretation 7, 8, 31, 192, 194; all-risk insurance 146; causation and 29, 36–38; common-sense principles in 30; concurrent causes 104, 113; exclusions 174; maritime perils 150; non-marine risks 166; war risks policy 36
- contractual liabilities 2, 62
- contractual limitation 28–29; defined 8; recognised 31
- contra proferentem policy 137, 138, 146
- correlation 1, 235; causation and 198; statistical 16; successive losses and successive causes 53
- counterfactual dependence: cause-in-fact 70, 78; cause-in-law 72; Inchmaree Clause 59; insurance causation 70–74; non-insured or excluded perils 71; tort law 23–24, 79; warranties, breach of 237
- counterfactual theory 22, 70
- COVID-19
- assessment of quantum 201–203; BI cover 201–203; business interruption cover 170–172; causation and interpretation 28, 35; FCA test 3
- criminal law 2, 5, 11, 23–25, 70, 78, 207
- criminal liabilities 2, 6
- criminal offences 2
- Croom-Johnson, J. 216
- cumulative causes 86–87, 125
- cumulative damage 123
- custom 43, 117–118
- decisive cause 67, 236
- delay 45–46, 47, 54, 66, 93–94, 149, 174, 177–181, 183; efficiency test 180
- de minimis rule 85, 86
- detention 106
- deviation 41
- direct cause 43–49, 66–67, 70, 105, 112, 161, 165
- direct damage 70
- disappearances see unexplainable losses
- dominant cause 104–105, 107, 112, 115, 141–142
- double insurance 127
- due diligence 154–158, 162
- due diligence proviso 154–160
- ‘due to’, definition of 60
- duplicate necessity, defined 20
- duty of fair presentation: assured’s 9, 235–237; pre-contractual 239
- economic loss 95
- Eder, J. 229
- Edgarton, H. 26
- Edwards-Stuart, J. 222–223
- effective cause 46, 51, 67–69, 111–113, 127, 162, 164, 172
- efficiency test 27–28, 44–49; chain of efficiency 51–55; common sense approach 44, 55, 103–104, 107, 121; delay 180; effective cause 51; historical development 44, 49–50; inevitable consequence test 53; inherent vice 162; marine insurance 44, 49–50, 51–55, 109–110; necessary condition test 51, 72–73; proximate cause 49–52, 55; reinsurance 173; seaworthiness 109, 164; successive causes 51–55; time order test 51; two independent perils of equal efficiency 118–123; wilful misconduct 176
- efficient cause test 44, 56, 74, 76, 115, 162, 164, 169, 175, 178, 201
- ejusdem generis approach 149, 156
- Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 62
- employment clause 83, 98, 100, 111–112, 202, 218
- equal efficiency 165; concurrent causes 103–104, 107, 109, 114, 118–123, 124–127, 132, 141, 143; independent perils 118–123
- equivalent causes, theory of 140
- Erection All Risks (EAR) policy 187, 223
- Erle, J. 161
- exclusions see non-insured or excluded perils
- expert evidence 1, 7, 126
- express warranties 232
- external factors: The Cendor MOPU 129, 131–134; concurrent causes 130–131; fortuitous external facts 131–133; inherent vice 129–135; internal causes 129–135; intervening causes 110, 132; intervention, definition of 110, 131–132; marine insurance 129–135; perils of the sea 129–135; proximate cause 129–136; seaworthiness 133–135; subject matter insured 183–184
- factual causation 2, 6–7, 9, 12, 31, 88, 100; burden of proof 220; but-for test 88, 100; and legal causation 25, 27–29, 38; machinery 193–194
- factual matrix 31, 45, 75
- fair presentation, duty of see duty of fair presentation
- fault 82, 89, 96, 108, 111, 146, 158, 167–170, 174, 186
- FCA test 56, 69, 72–76; Australia 171–172; business interruption cover 170–172; concurrent causes 103–104, 113, 120, 122, 128; contextual interpretation and common-sense principles 33, 35; COVID-19 3; machinery 195, 196–197, 203
- financial losses 168, 179, 195
- fire 46, 58, 61, 108, 119–120, 123–124, 131, 205, 208–209, 222–223
- fixed platforms 148
- foreseeability 70, 75, 80, 87, 101–102, 152; but-for test 80, 101–102; machinery 193, 193n1
- fortuity: all-risk insurance 144–146, 215–217; burden and standard of proof 208–209, 211; external causes 131–133; inherent vice 131–132; internal causes 131–133; marine risks 148; perils of the sea 151–154; subject matter insured 181, 183–188; unexplainable losses 221, 225
- fraud 144, 154, 174, 207–212
- fraudulent claims 9, 154, 231; collateral lies vs. 237–239; defined 238; forms of 238; as wilful misconduct 174
- freedom of contract 137, 139
- freight policies 47–48, 156, 177, 179–180
- frustration 179, 212–213
- frustration clause, war risks policy 179
- good faith 41, 127, 235–236
- Green, L. 26
- Green, S. 84, 87, 95
- gross negligence 169
- Gürses, Ö. 234
- Guy, J. A. 169
- Hague Visby Rules 158
- Halsbury 49
- Halsbury's laws 127, 156
- Hart, H. L. A. 1–3, 5–9, 12–16, 18–21, 27, 31, 37–39, 44, 115, 119–121, 159, 167–168, 231, 239
- Hill, J. 175
- Hodges, S. 164
- Hoffmann, L. 7
- Honoré, T. 1–3, 5–9, 12–16, 18–21, 27, 31, 37–39, 44, 115, 119–121, 159, 167–168, 231, 239
- hull insurance: delay 177–179, 181; Institute Time Clauses Hulls 51, 146, 150, 155, 157; Institute Voyage Clauses Hulls 150; International Hull Clauses 150; marine risks 149–150; seaworthiness 133, 160, 164–165; voyage 160
- Hume, D. 1
- Hume's Regularity Theory 10–11
- Hurricane Katrina 71, 124
- Hurricane Rita 71, 72, 124
- Huybrechts, Marc A. 135, 140
- identification of cause of loss 144–192; all-risks insurance 144–146; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 188–192; exclusions 173–188; indemnity 3; marine insurance 146–165; non-marine insurance 165–173; reinsurance 172–173
- immediate cause 43–49, 66–67, 80, 146, 162–163, 165, 167–168; checked Inchmaree Clause 148, 150, 154–160; Inchmaree Clause 209
- implied warranties 232
- Inchmaree Clause: accidents 158, 162; checked 148, 150, 154–160; counterfactual dependence 59; immediate cause 209; marine insurance 148, 150, 154–160; negligence 156–158; perils of the sea 151–160
- indemnity principle: but-for test 83, 97, 100, 101, 102; cause of loss 3; concurrent causes 105, 108, 111–112, 116, 123, 126–128, 135–136; machinery 194, 195–200, 202–204; marine insurance 141, 196–198; measure of 2–3; tort 83, 97, 100, 101, 102; United States 127; warranties, breach of 230–231, 239
- independent operations 121
- indispensable causes 106, 119, 122, 131
- industrial diseases 124
- inevitable consequence test: but-for test 53; cause-in-law 74; efficiency test 53; insured perils 75; Marine Insurance Act 1906 53, 74–76; non-insured or excluded perils 75; proximate cause 53, 74–76
- ingress of water 54, 61, 106, 119, 153, 154, 158, 189, 216, 220–221, 226
- inherent vice 36, 162, 178; all risks 223; The Cendor MOPU 4, 110, 129, 131–134; delay 178; efficiency test 162; external factors 129–135; fortuitous external accidents or casualties 131–132; internal factors 129–135; latent defects 131; proximate cause 129–135; seaworthiness 162; sole causes 109–110; subject matter insured 180–187, 118–123; unexplainable losses 223
- inland waters 148
- Institute Additional Perils Clause (IAPC) 48, 158
- Institute Cargo Clauses: A 4, 145, 150, 186–187, 190, 216, 224; all risks 184; ‘attributable to’, definition of 58; B 145, 146, 150; burden of proof 216, 224; C 145, 150; FPA 58
- Institute Clauses: Institute Freight Clauses Time 150; Institute Freight Clauses Voyage 150; Institute Strikes Clause 117, 190; Institute Strikes Riots and Civil Commotions Clause 58; Institute Time Clauses Hulls 51, 58, 146, 150, 155, 157, 180; Institute Voyage Clauses Hulls 150; Institute War Clause 58, 117; see also Institute Cargo Clauses
- insurable interest 4, 41, 45, 177, 194
- insurance 144–145; unexplainable losses 217, 220–222, 224–228; wear and tear 152, 156–157, 180–181, 183; see also liability insurance
- Insurance Act 2015 9, 160, 230–231; assured's duty of fair presentation 235–237; breaching terms of insurance contracts 232–235; cause and effect 231; cause of loss 231–239; fraudulent claims vs. collateral lies 237–239; “qualifying breach” 236; “some bearing” 235; “terms not relevant to the actual loss” 234; “warranties and other terms” 232; see also warranties, breach of
- Insurance Contracts Act 1984 233
- insurance liability, warranties, breach of 230–239
- insured pays 5
- insured perils 2–4; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 189–190, 192; barratry 209; burden of proof 205–210, 212–215, 217, 220–221, 224–225, 229; business interruption cover 170; ‘caused by’, definition of 57–58; concurrent causes 103–106, 104–105, 108, 110, 113–114, 116, 118, 121, 125–128, 133–134, 142; definition 144; delay 177–180; excluded peril 127–129; inevitable consequence test 75; marine risks 148, 150; one peril that falls into more than one heading of peril 118; proximate cause 57–58; ‘proximately’, variations as to 58, 59; seaworthiness 163–165; series of related perils 51; subject matter insured 118–123; unexplainable losses 217, 220–221, 224–225, 229; uninsured peril 126–127; wilful misconduct 177; see also non-insured or excluded perils: perils of the sea
- insuring clauses 42, 67, 117; burden of proof 228; concurrent causes 139; interpretation 29, 31, 35, 113, 144, 146, 155, 167–168, 170, 170–171, 173; machinery 195–197; risks 8, 34, 37
- intention: but-for test 97; ‘caused by’, definition of 57–58; concurrent causes 103, 107, 111, 116, 136–140; efficiency test 55
- interdependent causes 51, 119, 122, 128, 141
- internal causes: apportionment 129; The Cendor MOPU 129, 131–134; concurrent causes 129–135; external causes 129–135; fortuitous external facts 131–133; inherent vice 129–135; intervening causes 110, 132; marine insurance 129–135; marine risks 149; perils of the sea 129–136, 152–153; proximate cause 129–136; seaworthiness 133–135; subject matter insured 181; see also inherent vice
- International Hull Clauses (IHC) 150
- interpretation 10–12, 175–177, 179, 182, 185, 191; actual causation 22–24; ambiguity 31, 65, 137, 138, 143, 181; business interruption claims 55; but-for test 56, 78, 83–87, 89–91, 99; and causation 34–37; ‘caused by’, definition in 57–58; cause-in-fact and cause-in-law 24–30; common-sense causation 12–21, 33–34, 104, 111, 113–114, 123, 125, 136–139, 141, 143; contextual 33–34; contra proferentem rule 137, 146; ejusdem generis rule 149, 156; historical development 43–44; identification of cause of loss 153–154, 158–165; juridical approaches 30–31; marine insurance 105, 105–106; noscitur a sociis rule 149; textual interpretation 31–33; tort 78, 83–87, 89–91, 99
- intervening causes 52–55, 67–70, 79–80
- jettison 61, 146–147
- knowledge 127, 164, 186
- latent defects 131, 155
- Law Commission 148; warranties, breach of 232–233
- legal causation 78, 82, 88, 94, 100; see scope of liability
- legal liability 6, 25, 37, 56, 62; ascription 11, 24; causation for 31; judgments on 12; language to truncate 8–9; in tort 194
- Lewis’ theory 22–23
- liability insurance: but-for test 96–101; concurrent causes 136; exclusions 169–170; fault 167–170; identification of cause of loss 167–170; negligence 167–170; non-marine risks 165; professional indemnity insurance 65, 97, 167–170; tort 43, 96–97
- life assurance 41
- Lloyd's SG form 155, 177
- loss of a chance: burden of proof 93–94; but-for test 93–94; material contribution 84, 85–87, 89–95; medical negligence 92–95; standard of proof 78, 91; tort 92–95
- loss of time clauses 178–180, 194
- machinery 58, 150, 154, 193–195, 210; aggregation of losses 197–201; breakdown 51–52, 155–157; calculation of losses 195–197; COVID-19-related BI cover 201–204; factual causation 193–194; failure of 47; FCA test 195, 196–197, 203; foreseeability 193, 160; indemnity principle 194, 195–200, 202–204; insuring clauses 195–197; Marine Insurance Act 1906 194–195, 198; quantification 194–196, 197, 203
- Malone, Wex S. 26
- marine insurance: all risks 145; burden of proof 205–229; common sense approach 107; concurrent causes 105–112, 105–114, 129–130, 137, 140; definition 147; efficiency test 44, 49–50, 109–110; historical development of tests 43–55; identification of cause of loss 146–165; Inchmaree Clause 148, 150, 154–160; indemnity principle 146, 149, 156–158; proximate cause 105–114; seaworthiness 109; voyage policies 48, 153, 160–163; warranties, breach of 230–232, 236–237; war risks 116–117; see alsohull insurance; inherent vice; Institute Clauses; Marine Insurance Act 1906; perils of the sea; seaworthiness, warranties of; time policies
- Marine Insurance Act 1906 4–5, 9; all risks 145; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 188–191; Australia 40–41; but-for test 70–76; ‘caused by’, definition of 57, 65; delay 177; efficiency test 44, 49–50; exclusions 173–174; historical background 43–55; identification of cause of loss 146–149; included and excluded losses 41; inevitable consequence test 53, 74–76; interpretation 105–106; machinery 194–195, 198; marine risks/perils 52, 146–149; perils of the sea 151; privity of assured 133; ‘provisions of this Act’ 41; proximate cause 41; seaworthiness 160–164; subject matter insured 180–183; successive causes 50–51; time order test 50–51; ‘unless policy otherwise provides’ 41; utmost good faith 41; warranties, breach of 41, 230–232, 236–237; war risks policy 52; wilful misconduct 174, 176
- marine risks 146–150, 160; burden of proof 117, 141; defined 147–148; Marine Insurance Act 1906 52; maritime perils 146–149; war risks policy and 147
- maritime perils: contractual interpretation 150; defined 149
- material contribution 84, 85–87, 89–95; to risk 84, 87, 91; injury rule 84, 85, 87
- materiality 43, 51, 53, 84, 85–87, 89–95; burden of proof 206, 218–219; warranties, breach of 235–236, 239
- matrix of fact 31, 45, 75
- Mayban test 18, 135, 153, 185, 187
- McArthur, C. 161
- medical negligence 41, 78, 85–87, 92–96
- Merkin, R. 42, 100, 103, 153, 197, 234
- mesothelioma 83, 90–91, 97–100
- method of elimination 222, 224
- Mill, J. S. 14
- Miss Jay Jay principle 104, 109, 114, 118, 121–124, 127, 131–134, 139
- mitigation 188–192
- Moore-Bick, J. 97, 185, 199
- Moore, M. 23–24, 26, 55, 68, 70–71, 78–79, 84, 157
- moral hazard 207
- Morgan, J. 94
- mortality, definition of 146
- motor insurance 174
- multiple causes see concurrent causes
- Mustill, J. 213
- mysterious losses see unexplainable losses
- natural events 68, 69
- nature of subject matter insured 35, 50, 96, 126, 129, 133, 144, 155–156, 174, 179, 180–188; inherent vice 181–188; Marine Insurance Act 1906 149; packing, insufficiency of 186–188
- nearest cause test 45, 50, 109
- “nearest in time” test 48, 50
- necessary condition test 23, 51, 80; concurrent causes 115, 119–121, 141–142
- necessity: defined 20; test 178
- negligence 80, 85; collisions 108, 150; factual causal link 78; forms 159; gross 169; Inchmaree Clause 156–158; liability insurance 167–170; material contribution 88–90; medical negligence 41, 78, 85–87, 92–96; privity of assured 158, 161, 164–165; professional indemnity insurance 97; sue and labour 189; wilful misconduct 175–176
- Neill, L. J 166
- net, causation as a 50
- New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide 122
- New Zealand 40–41
- non-insured or excluded perils: burden of proof 214–215, 221; concurrent cause 114, 125, 126–127, 133–135, 139, 142; counterfactual dependence 71; inevitable consequence test 75; marine risks 149; seaworthiness 160, 163–164; successive torts 82–83
- non-intervention principle 119n64
- non-marine insurance: accidents 165–167; business interruption cover 170–172; fault 167–170; identification of cause of loss 165–173; liability insurance 167–170; marine insurance 147–148; motor insurance 81, 174; negligence 167–170; reinsurance 172–173
- non-marine risks, contractual interpretation 166
- Norwegian Marine Insurance Plan 141–142
- noscitur a sociis approach 149
- notice of abandonment 53, 188
- novus actus interveniens 52, 68
- occurrence, definition of 172–173
- O’May, D. 115, 116
- one cause see sole-cause situations
- ordinary breakage and leakage 133
- ordinary perils of the sea 46, 160, 225
- ordinary wear and tear 133, 156, 180–181
- overlapping losses 116–117, 127, 132
- packing, insufficiency of 186–188
- Parks, Alex L. 115
- partial losses 53, 154
- Pearson, J. 213
- perils of the sea 106–107, 111, 141, 151; burden of proof 213, 216–218, 220–221, 225–226, 4, 61; Clause 48; collisions 48, 151, 178; combination of perils 142; definition 131–134, 148, 149, 151–154, 216; delay 177–180; extraordinary 135; foreseeability 152; fortuitous accidents or casualties of the sea 151; frustration 212–213; historical development 46; identification of cause of loss 151–154; immediate cause 109; Inchmaree Clause 151–160; inherent vice 110, 129–135, 144; internal causes and external causes 129–135, 152; marine perils 147, 148; operative 134; ordinary perils 46, 134–135, 160, 225; proximate cause 4, 50, 106, 152, 154, 158–160, 163–166, 171, 175; sea water, incursion of 151, 153–154; seaworthiness 160, 218, 225–226; time order 46; unexplainable losses 220–221, 225–226; weather 151, 152; wind and waves, ordinary action of the 152–154, 216, 223
- perils see insured perils;see perils of the sea
- Personal Accident policy 166
- personal injury 62–63, 94
- policy limitations 3, 7–8, 27, 39, 120, 167, 168
- pollution 79–80, 150
- The Popi M case 214, 220–224
- Popplewell, J. 224
- Porat, A. 220
- precedents 5, 50, 103–105, 131, 148, 158, 163, 166, 181
- preceding causes 107
- predominant cause 49, 49–51, 175; efficiency test 49–51
- presumptions: burden of proof 205, 217–218, 220, 225–227, 229; of innocence 208, 210, 208, 210, 217–218, 220, 224–227, 229
- prima facie evidence 182, 213–215
- privity of assured 133, 158, 161, 164–165
- probabilistic causation 219
- professional indemnity insurance 65, 97, 169
- promissory warranty 9, 160, 232
- proof see burden of proof;see standard of proof
- property insurance 102, 126, 137, 144–145
- protection and indemnity (P&I) liability insurance 61–62
- proximate cause 2, 6–7, 97, 167–170; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 188–192; burden of proof 206, 215, 221–224, 229; but-for test 70–76, 96–97, 119; Causa proxima non remota spectatur principle 44–45; ‘caused by’, definition of 57–58; collisions 81, 106–108, 149; common sense approach 44, 103–143; damage 4; defined 9; definition 49–51, 62; efficiency test 49–52, 55; external causes 129–135; factual matrix 75; historical background 43–55; identification of cause of loss 172–173; inevitable consequence test 53, 74–76; inherent vice 129–135; internal causes 129–135; loss in claims 3–4; marine insurance 58, 61, 63, 65, 105–114; packing, insufficiency of 186–188; perils of the sea 4, 50, 106, 152–154; proximate, definition of 49; ‘proximately’, variations as to 58, 65–67; seaworthiness 160, 164–165; successive causes 50–51; tests of causation 40–76; time order test 48, 50–51; tort 96–97; unexplainable losses 221–224, 229; warranties, breach of 230–239; wilful misconduct 175–176
- ‘proximately’, variations as to 58, 65–67
- proximity doctrine 41, 51, 55, 57–66, 74; warranties, breach of 230
- quantification machinery 194–196, 197, 203; see also machinery
- quantum of loss proof 206
- real cause 67, 153, 185, 221
- reasonable contemplation test 75
- reasonable expectations 137
- reinsurance: efficiency test 173; occurrence, definition of 172–173; one event, definition of 173
- remoteness: but-for test 101–102; damage 6, 25, 26, 44; delay 178; historical development 44; marine insurance 50, 107, 112, 132; reinsurance 173; succeeding causes 107; tort 101–102
- repairs: delay 45–46, 47, 66, 177–178; discharging and reshipment 178; inherent vice 178, 180–181; negligence 155; proximate cause 49–50, 81; remoteness 101
- restraint of princes 52–53
- ‘results from’, definition of 60
- risk theory 61
- Road Traffic Act 1988 174
- Rothstein, P. F. 16
- safety regulations, breach of 174, 178
- scalarity of causation 55–57
- scope of liability 6, 8, 26–27, 78, 101, 193–194, 198, 204–205
- scuttling 174, 176, 207–208, 210–211, 213
- seaworthiness, warranties of 109–111; ‘a cause’ test 163–165; ‘attributable to’, definition of 162, 164–165; burden of proof 218, 220, 225–226; but-for test 162–165; definition 133–134, 160–161; due diligence 162; effective cause 162, 164; efficiency test 134, 164–165; external causes 133–135; goods 162–163; hull insurance 133, 160, 164; identification of cause of loss 160–165; implied warranties 160–161, 165; inherent vice 162; internal causes 133–135; interpretation 166; Marine Insurance Act 1906 160–161, 164; non-insured or excluded perils 160, 163–164; perils of the sea, interaction with other 160, 162, 165; presumptions 225–227; privity of assured 161, 164–165; proximate cause 129–135, 163–165; reasonably, meaning of 160; test of causation 160–165; time policies 160–161, 163–164; unexplainable losses 225–226; variation of contracts 160, 165; voyage policies 48, 161, 163, 225–226; weather 226, 227; wilful misconduct, definition of 163
- seizure, confiscation and capture 46, 53–54, 79, 106, 147, 159, 178, 183, 188
- sexual assault 63
- Shelltime 112
- ‘Sherlock Holmes dictum’ 224
- shipbuilding contracts 148
- Simon, J. 42
- sine qua non 7, 23, 27, 78, 101n104
- Single Business Interruption Loss (SBIL) 202
- single causes see sole-cause situations
- Siopis, J. 4
- sole-cause situations 85, 92; ‘arising out of one event’, definition of 173; concurrent causes 67, 104, 106–108, 107, 109, 111–112, 115, 125, 133; ‘solely, definition of 111
- standard of proof 78, 91, 206–209, 212, 224; see also burden of proof
- standard terms see Institute Clauses
- Stapleton, J. 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 20, 26, 77, 78, 95, 193–194
- Steele, J. 42
- Stein, A 220
- strict liability 80, 96
- strike clauses 130, 147–150
- Stuart-Smith, L. J. 209
- subject matter see nature of subject matter insured
- subrogation 77, 172, 177
- successive causes 50–55, 107; correlation 53
- sue and labour 189–192
- Summers, A. 20–21
- suspensive effect 232
- ‘take the plaintiff as they find him’ principle 81–83
- terminology 9, 20, 49, 55, 57
- terrorism 80
- tests of causation 40–76, 158; application 12; but-for test 84; historical development 43–55; Marine Insurance Act 1906, proximate cause under 40–55; proximate cause under 40–76; seaworthiness 160–165
- textual interpretation 31–33
- third possible solution theory 221
- time charterparties 111–112
- time order test 163–164; certainty 48; chain of events 55; charterparty clauses 47; concurrent causes 106–107; delay 47, 178; efficiency test 53; historical development 43–44, 46, 48; immediate or direct loss 43–44; marine insurance 50–51, 107; materiality test 43; perils of the sea 46; proximate cause 53; successive causes 53
- time policies 156, 160–161, 163–164; Institute Time Clauses 51
- tortious liabilities 2, 6, 62, 90
- tort law 5, 9, 43; accident compensation system 77; breach of duty as causing loss 78–80, 83, 90, 92, 101; burden of proof 78, 84, 87, 89; but-for test 77–102; concurrent causes 82–83, 136; damages 77–86, 88–96, 101–102; factual causation 88, 100; fault 82, 89, 96, 108, 111; foreseeability 80, 87, 101–102; intervening acts 79–80; material contribution 84, 85–87, 89–95; multiple causes 84; necessary condition test 80; one tort scenarios 79–80; proximate cause 96–97; remoteness 101–102; strict liability 80, 96; subrogation 77; successive torts 80–83; ‘take the plaintiff as they find him’ principle 81–83; see also negligence
- total loss 146, 155–156; actual total loss 52–53, 179; constructive total loss 52, 53, 179, 188, 191; fire 163
- towage 186n186
- trends clauses 3, 28, 71–74, 194–197, 204
- Tucker, J. 151–152
- unexplainable losses: burden of proof 217–229; circumstantial evidence 227; definition 217; elimination approach 220–224; “evidentiary gap” cases in tort 218–220; fortuity 221, 225; mysterious disappearance clauses 216, 227–229; perils of the sea 220–221, 225–226; The Popi M 220–224; presumptions 217–218, 220, 224–227, 229; proximate cause 221–224, 229; seaworthiness 225–226; third possible solution theory 221; unexplainability 217–224
- uninsured risks see non-insured or excluded perils
- United States: concurrent causes 108, 122, 128, 137, 143; indemnity principle 127; intervening causes 70; noninsured or excluded perils 128
- unities doctrine 173
- ‘unless policy otherwise provides’: definition of 41
- unseaworthiness see seaworthiness; warranties of
- utmost good faith 41, 127, 235–236
- vicissitude of life principle 82, 82n26
- voyage policies 4, 18, 46, 49, 52–54, 135, 146, 153, 160–163, 180–182, 180–181, 184–186, 188, 225–226; animals 146; Australia 186; commencement 50, 162, 226; designated 182, 188; failure of machinery 47; implied warranty in 160–161; marine insurance 48; perils of sea 45, 225–226; sea conditions and weather 186; seaworthiness, warranties of 48; shipping 130; threat of perils 188; unexplainability 217; unseaworthiness in 48, 110; vessel Kastor Too 119
- warehouse policies 129
- war-like operations 108, 116–117
- warn, failure to 83
- warranties, breach of 231–239; assured's non-compliance 234–235; Australia 233; burden of proof 213; but-for test 235, 236; causal connection test 232–233, 235–237, 239; express warranties 232; free of capture or seizure 147; implied warranties 160–161, 165, 232; indemnity principle 230–231, 239; insurance liability 230–239; Law Commission 232–233; marine insurance 230–232, 236–237; Marine Insurance Act 1906 41, 230–232, 236–237; materiality 235–236, 239; promissory warranty 9, 160, 232; proximate cause of loss 230–239; proximity doctrine 230; standard terms 232–235; suspensive effect 232; warranties, defined 232; see also seaworthiness; warranties of
- war risks policy 52, 66, 116–117, 147, 179, 210, 108, 116–117; contractual interpretation 36; frustration clause in 179; Marine Insurance Act 1906 52; maritime risks and 141, 147
- water, ingress of 54, 61, 106, 119, 153, 154, 158, 189, 216, 220–221, 226
- Wayne Tank principle 103–104, 113–116, 118, 121–124, 131, 135–139, 142
- wear and tear 133, 152, 156–157, 180–181, 183, 183n176
- weather 45, 54–55, 61, 151–153, 177–178, 181, 186, 226, 227; see alsowind and waves, ordinary action of
- wilful misconduct of assureds 174–177; agents 176; apprehension of peril and mitigation measures 176; burden of proof 207, 209–211, 175–176; definition 174–175; efficiency test 176; fraudulent claims 174; inherent vice 178; insurable interest 177; Marine Insurance Act 1906, exclusions under 174–177; negligence 175–176; proximate cause 175–176; safety regulations, breach of 174, 178; scuttling 174, 176; seaworthiness 174
- wind and waves, ordinary action of 109, 134, 152–154, 216, 223
- ‘winner-takes-all-principle’ 135
- Wright, Richard W. 3, 6, 26, 194
- wrongful act policy 7–8, 58, 115, 161, 201, 230