LLR: Financial Crime

General Editor: Karl Laird</br> Editorial Advisory Board:</br> Professor Peter Alldridge</br> Professor Jeremy Horder</br> Professor David Ormerod KC</br> Professor John R Spencer</br> Richard Burger</br> William Clegg KC</br> Colin Nicholls KC</br> Jonathan Pickworth </br> Nicholas Purnell KC</br> Case reporters and commentators:</br> Academic:</br> </br> Practitioner:</br> Allison Clare KC</br> Sarah Clarke KC</br> Anita Clifford</br>Susannah Cogman</br> Rachel Cook</br> Alex Davidson </br>Eleanor Davison</br> Adina Ezekiel</br> Elaine Freer</br> William Hays</br> Bryan Heaney</br> Nichola Higgins</br> Shula de Jersey</br> Paul Jarvis</br> Nicholas Johnson KC</br> Alice Lepeuple</br> Robin Loof</br>Jennifer Newcomb</br> Quinton Newcomb</br>James Purchas</br> Andrew Smith</br> Aaron Watkins</br> Sebastian Walker</br> Gabriele Watts</br>

Document

R (WORLD UYGHUR CONGRESS) v NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY (SPOTLIGHT ON CORRUPTION, INTERVENOR)

[2024] Lloyd's Rep FC 295

COURT OF APPEAL(CIVIL DIVISION)

Before Carr,Lord Justice Bean,Lady Justice Andrews

Civil recovery – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Part 5 – Recoverable property – Investigation – No need to identify specific recoverable property before investigating – Foreign Prison-Made Goods Act 1897, section 1 – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, sections 241, 241A, 242, 278, 304, 305, 306, 308, 327, 328, 329, 340 and 341. – Money laundering – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Part 7 – Criminal property – Investigation – Section 329(2)(c) exemption from criminal liability – Adequate consideration – Giving adequate consideration for property does not mean that the property was no longer criminal property – Foreign Prison-Made Goods Act 1897 – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, sections 241, 241A, 242, 278, 304, 305, 306, 308, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331 and 340.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.