i-law

Arbitration Law Monthly

Removal of an arbitrator: apparent bias

Allegations of apparent bias against an arbitrator are commonly made, albeit normally in the context of a challenge to an award for serious irregularity under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996. Very often the accusation is a makeweight. It is much rarer for a party to seek the removal of an arbitrator during the currency of proceedings based on the arbitrator's potentially biased conduct up to that point.

H1 and Another v W and Others [2024] EWHC 382 (Comm); [2024] 1 Lloyd's Rep 449 is one of the exceptional cases where an arbitrator was challenged and removed on the ground of apparent bias under section 24(1)(a) of the 1996 Act.

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.