i-law

International Construction Law Review

WORLDS APART: EPC AND EPCM CONTRACTS: RISK ISSUES AND ALLOCATION

PHILIP LOOTS

Group General Counsel of Clough Limited (Australia)

NICK HENCHIE

Partner, International Construction and Engineering Group, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP

Introduction

For many years now it seems that the most desired way for an owner to procure a major construction project, particularly one being project financed, was via a fixed-price, lump-sum turnkey route; the so-called engineering, procurement and construction contract (“EPC contract”). By this route, funders and owners expect to get the degree of certainty as to time and costs that they require. Such has been the popularity of this method of procurement that organisations such as FIDIC responded to the need for appropriate standard forms that more closely reflected market conditions by, for example, the introduction of its Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Contracts (the Silver Book).1 Orgalime2 and ICC3 followed suit to join other standard forms produced by organisations such as ENAA,4 ICE5 and ECC.6 Most recently, FIDIC has responded to the requirements of the major development banks by introducing the MDB


Pt 3]
EPC and EPCM Contracts: Risk Issues and Allocation

253

The rest of this document is only available to i-law.com online subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, click Log In button.

Copyright © 2024 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.