Voyage Charters
Page 918
Chapter 36
Nomination of Loading and Discharging Ports
|
Clause 4(a) – loading port(s)
36.2 The first sentence specifies the latest times at which, depending on the circumstances in which the vessel is chartered, the charterer is to nominate the loading port. The charterer may, however, order the vessel to St. Kitts, if on a voyage to a port in the Caribbean or U.S. Gulf, or Port Said, if on a voyage from west of Port Said to the eastern Mediterranean or Persian Gulf, for wireless orders. If no nomination has been made before arrival at St. KittsPage 919
Clause 4(b) – discharging port(s)
36.5 Clause 4(b) gives the charterer the option of nominating a discharge port by radio before arriving at or off Land’s End, Suez or Gibraltar, depending on the precise voyage. However, there are a number of express qualifications to the option. First, the order must be “lawful”, which presumably means that the voyage which it involves must not be illegal under the proper law of the charter or the law of the place of performance and must not involve a breach of owner’s obligations to the bill of lading holder. If the bill of lading names a specific port or ports, the charterer will normally be regarded as having made a nomination to the like effect under the charter.2 Second, the nomination must be consistent with Part I and the bill of lading, which means that the discharging port(s) so nominated must fall within the geographical range if one has been selected and within the allowed quantity specified in Part I. And if the discharging port is already conclusively identified in Part I, no further nomination can be made under clause 4(b).Clause 4(c) – change of loading or discharging port
36.6 Under English law a valid nomination under a port charter involves an election and unless the charter otherwise provides the charterer generally has no right to change the nomination.3 Clause 4(c) is difficult to interpret. In the previous editions of this work it was submitted, on balance, that the clause does by necessary implication confer a right of renomination in respect of ports named under clause 4(a) or 4(b), but limited to ports which can fairly be said to be within the same range as the port originally nominated. However, in The Antiparos,4 it was held that there was insufficient basis to imply into clause 4(c) a right to change nomination, the better view being that it merely anticipated, and provided expressly for the consequences of, a situation in which the owners acceded to the charterers’ request to change a nomination.5Page 920
The Jasmine B was chartered on the Asbatankvoy form for a voyage from the Black Sea to a maximum of three discharging ports in various ranges including Mediterranean, U.S.A. and Caribbean. Special Provision M1 conferred on the charterer the right (exercisable as many times as deemed necessary):