i-law

Litigation Letter

Order was Disproportionate

Keith v CPM Field Marketing Ltd (TLR 29 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

STATE FUNDING

The Lord Chancellor’s Department’s consultation paper on Financial Conditions in Civil Cases proposes that the rule about current disposable capital will be changed so that applicants with over £3,000 of equity in their home (the..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Order Set Aside for Defects

Gadget Shop Ltd v Bug.Com Ltd and others (TLR 28 June CH D)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Changing Defendant’s Name

Gregson v Channel Four Television Corporation (TLR 11 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Relying on Counsel’s Advice

Oakes v Hopcroft (CLW 15 September CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Denial of Justice Relevant to Forum

Lubbe and others v Cape plc and Related Appeals (TLR 20 July H of L)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Forum Non-Conveniens

Ace Insurance SA-NV v Zurich Insurance Company and another (TLR 6 September QBD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Enforcement Review

The first phase of the Lord Chancellor’s Review of Enforcement announced in March 1998 has concluded with the basic finding that the need for the level of information available to the courts and creditors should be improved, so that the most..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Reciprocal Enforcement in Austria, Finland, Sweden and Poland

The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (Amendment) Order 2000 Made 12 July 2000
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Summary Disposal

James v Evans (TLR 2 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

JUDGES

Litigation Delay Insurance
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

International Consistency

State of Brunei Darussalam v Bolkiah (TLR 5 September Ch D)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Implacable Opposition to Contact

H (A Child: Indirect Contact) (CLW 25 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

New Human Rights and Pension Rules

The Family Proceedings (Amendment) Rules 2000 amend the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 in two main respects. Rule 10 inserts a new rule 10.26, providing a procedural code for cases concerning the Human Rights Act 1998 including the requirement that..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Supervising Incapable Adult

In Re F (Adult: Courts Jurisdiction) (TLR 26 June CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Family Law Act Lacuna

Nwogbe v Nwogbe (TLR 11 July CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Human Rights

In Re F (Minors) (Care Proceedings: Contact) (TLR 22 June FD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Fresh Evidence After Judgment

Townsend v Achilleas (CLW 25 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Facilitated Communication Not Reliable

In Re D (A Child) (Evidence: Facilitated Communication) (TLR 26 July FD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Using Other Party’s Witness Statement

Society of Lloyd’s v Jaffray and others (TLR 3 August QBD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Witness Immunity for Evidence Not Actions

Docker and others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (TLR 1 August H of L)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Interest Remains at 2%

Lawrence v Chief Constable of Staffordshire (TLR 25 July CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Councils Liable for Special Needs Failure

Phelps v Hillingdon LBC and Associated Cases (TLR 28 July H of L)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Compensation is for Financial Not Emotional Loss

Thomas v Kwik Save Stores Ltd (TLR 27 June CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

CPR AMENDMENTS

Civil Procedure (Amendment No 4) Rules 2000
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Costs Order in Children Cases

Re W (A Child) (CLW 25 August CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Children Entitled to Legal Aid

Regina v Legal Aid Board ex parte W and others (The Independent 20 July CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Costs in a Quagmire

Speaking at the Law Society launch of Cook on Costs 2000, the first annual edition of his book (Butterworths £55) Judge Michael Cook, our general editor, said that although costs were seen as the lynch pin of the Civil Procedure Rules, they..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Costs Mediation

Costs Judge Martin Ellis retired as a Costs Judge on 4 August and now offers his services as a Costs Mediator. The Commercial Court has added his name to their list of ADR providers. He hopes his service will assist the parties to litigation and..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Advocacy Graduated Fee Scheme for Family Cases

The Lord Chancellor is proposing to introduce a new payment scheme for barrister advocates who undertake publicly funded family work later this year. This brief outline of the proposals, as they currently stand is set taken from the CLS publication..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

In-House Lawyers

Maes Finance Ltd v W G Edwards & Partners (CLW 21 July QBD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Justifying Counsel’s Fees

Armitgage v Nurse (Assessment of Costs) (CLW 11 August Ch D)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Prioritising Payment of Debts

In Re Structural Concrete Ltd (TLR 5 July Ch D)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

BARRISTERS

BookCounsel. Com
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

No Immunity from Suit for Advocates

Arthur J S Hall & Co (A Firm) v Simons and Associated Cases (TLR 21 July H of L)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Cohabiting Solicitors Removed

In Re L (Minors) (Care Proceedings: Cohabiting Solicitors) (TLR 27 July FD)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Unreasonable Refusal to Agree

In Re F (Minors) (Adoption: Freeing Order) (TLR 6 July CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Birkett v James No Longer Rules

Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton and another (TLR 5 July CA)
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

The Two Messages

Human Rights are not an alien system of law being grafted on to our own. They are a set of values which is continuous with those of the common law and which Parliament itself has voted to adopt. The approach to the Convention is through, not..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

A Structured Approach

The Strasbourg Court itself has a structured approach to the Human Rights Act, which the United Kingdom courts might usefully follow: 1. Has there been an interference with the right? 2. Is the interference lawful? 3. What are the aims of the..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

The Judicial Approach

What will be the judicial approach be to human rights points? In Daniels v Walker (CA 19/LL p72) Lord Woolf said it would be unfortunate if case management decisions involved the need to refer to the learning of the European Court of Justice on..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

What Will Be Its Effect?

Will there be a flood of litigation arising out of the Act? Of course there will! The late, great Joseph Jackson QC said that every piece of important new legislation meant ten years of work for the legal profession. The Daily Mail called it a..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Business as Usual

It should have come as no surprise that it was business as usual in the courts on 2 October. There was no revolution for the very good reason that in England and the English courts there is nothing revolutionary about respect, indeed reverence, for..
Online Published Date:  01 October 2000

Copyright © 2025 Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited is registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address 5th Floor, 10 St Bride Street, London, EC4A 4AD, United Kingdom. Lloyd's List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited.

Lloyd's is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd's Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd's.